Recursive Estimators in Sample Survey Statistics
1. Introduction to Estimation in Sample Surveys
The fundamental objective of estimation in sample surveys is to infer characteristics of a population based on data collected from a subset of that population, known as a sample. This process typically involves estimating population parameters such as means, totals, proportions, or regression coefficients. However, achieving accurate and efficient estimation poses several challenges, particularly in complex survey designs that incorporate features like stratification, clustering, and unequal probabilities of selection. Survey statisticians continuously seek methods that can address these challenges effectively. One such approach is recursive estimation, a technique where the estimate of a population parameter is updated sequentially as new data points or batches of data become available. This contrasts with traditional "batch" estimators, which necessitate the availability and processing of the entire dataset before an estimate can be computed.
The relevance of recursive estimation has grown significantly in modern survey practices. This increased importance can be attributed to several factors, including the proliferation of longitudinal surveys and panel studies that involve repeated measurements on the same units over time, the increasing availability of continuous data streams originating from sensors or online platforms that can be integrated with survey data, and the rising demand for real-time monitoring and analysis of population trends. In such dynamic data environments, methods that can adapt and update estimates efficiently as new information arrives offer substantial advantages. Recursive estimation algorithms can update estimates to account for new data and improve the robustness of models within the sample period.1 This adaptability allows for a more nuanced understanding of evolving population characteristics. Furthermore, recursive estimation provides computational advantages over the standard practice of re-estimation using the entire (larger) data set and can reduce storage requirements.1 This efficiency is crucial when dealing with the increasing volume and velocity of data in contemporary survey research.
The sequential nature of data collection in many modern surveys naturally aligns with the principles of recursive estimation. Each new observation or wave of data provides an opportunity to refine our understanding of the population parameter of interest, building upon the information gleaned from previous observations. This iterative process can lead to more accurate and robust estimates over time, as the estimator adapts to the accumulating evidence. The adoption of recursive estimation techniques can also significantly impact the efficiency and timeliness of survey analysis. Real-time monitoring of population trends becomes feasible, allowing for quicker identification of emerging issues and more agile responses from policymakers and researchers. Moreover, the ability to assess model robustness within the sample period, as mentioned in the context of recursive estimation algorithms 1, suggests a potential for adaptive survey designs where the data itself can inform adjustments to the data collection process or the underlying models.
2. Defining the Recursive Estimator in Sample Surveys
In the context of sample survey statistics, a recursive estimator is a type of estimator where the estimate of a population parameter at a given step is computed based on the estimate obtained at the preceding step and the new data observed at the current step.1 This iterative process of sequential updating is the defining characteristic of recursive estimation. As new data becomes available, the estimator is applied repeatedly, with each iteration refining the previous estimate. This stands in contrast to batch estimators, which require the entire sample dataset to be available and processed collectively to produce a single estimate. Examples of batch estimators prevalent in survey sampling include the standard sample mean or the Horvitz-Thompson estimator calculated using the complete sample.
The recursive estimation process typically begins with an initialization phase, where an initial estimate is established. This initial value can be based on prior knowledge, results from previous surveys, or a small initial subset of the current data. Following this initialization, an update step is applied iteratively. This step involves a predefined recursive formula that takes the estimate from the previous step and incorporates the information from the newly arrived data point(s) to produce an updated estimate. The specific form of this recursive formula is tailored to the parameter being estimated and the underlying assumptions about the population and the sampling process. The terms "on-line," "recursive," and "sequential" estimation are often used interchangeably to describe these procedures, emphasizing the continuous updating of parameter estimates as new data becomes available.1 For instance, in variance estimation, a recursive equation can be used to perform a running estimate of the variance as the samples are received sequentially.2 This sequential nature allows for dynamic analysis and adaptation, which is particularly valuable in survey settings where data collection might span over time, and waiting for the entire dataset before analysis can lead to delays in obtaining crucial insights. The contrast with batch estimators underscores the efficiency gains associated with recursive methods, as they avoid the computational cost of repeatedly analyzing the complete dataset from scratch with each new observation.
3. Mathematical Formulation of Recursive Estimators
The general form of a recursive equation can be expressed as: θ̂_k = f(θ̂_(k-1), y_k, k), where θ̂_k is the estimate of the population parameter θ at step k (after observing k data points), θ̂_(k-1) is the estimate at the previous step k-1, y_k is the new data point (or set of data points) observed at step k, and f is a function that defines how the update is performed. The index k might also appear explicitly in the function to account for changing factors like sample size or time.
One of the most fundamental examples is the recursive estimation of the mean. The formula for recursively updating the sample mean is given by: μ̂_k = μ̂_(k-1) + (1/k) * (y_k - μ̂_(k-1)), where μ̂_k is the sample mean after k observations and y_k is the k-th observation.3 This formula illustrates that the updated mean is obtained by taking the previous mean and adding a correction term proportional to the difference between the new observation and the previous mean. The weight given to this difference, 1/k, decreases as the sample size k increases, reflecting the growing confidence in the existing estimate.
For recursive estimation of the variance, a common formula for the sample variance is: s_k^2 = ((k-2)/(k-1)) * s_(k-1)^2 + (1/k) * (y_k - μ̂_k)^2, where s_k^2 is the sample variance after k observations and μ̂_k is the recursively calculated mean. Another recursive equation for variance estimation, often seen in signal processing, is: σ̂_k^2 = B * σ̂_(k-1)^2 + C * (x_k - μ̂_(k-1))^2, where B and C are constants with 0 < B < 1.2 This formulation introduces a forgetting factor B, which gives more weight to recent observations and is particularly useful when the variance might be changing over time. The constant C is often related to 1-B and may involve the sample size to ensure asymptotic unbiasedness.
The Recursive Regression Estimator is a crucial recursive method in survey sampling, particularly for repeated surveys.4 It is a recursive computational form of the best linear unbiased estimator. Recursive Least Squares (RLS) is a common algorithm for implementing recursive regression, where the regression coefficients are updated sequentially as new data points are observed.5 This involves updating both the coefficient vector and the inverse of the design matrix (or covariance matrix of the estimators) at each step using formulas that depend on the previous estimates, the new data, and a gain factor. Recursive regression is especially valuable in panel surveys and time series analysis of survey data where the relationships between variables might evolve over time.
Recursive Bayesian Estimation, also known as a Bayes filter, offers a different framework for recursive estimation.6 It is a general probabilistic approach for estimating an unknown probability density function recursively over time using incoming measurements and a mathematical process model. The process involves two key steps: prediction, where a process model is used to forecast the state at the next time step based on the previous posterior distribution, and update, where the new measurement is used to revise the predicted state and obtain the new posterior distribution using Bayes' theorem. This approach is particularly powerful when prior information about the parameter of interest is available and can be incorporated into the estimation process.
4. Key Properties of Recursive Estimators
The effectiveness of recursive estimators in sample surveys hinges on their key statistical properties, including bias, variance, and consistency.
Bias refers to the systematic difference between the expected value of the estimator and the true value of the population parameter. The bias of a recursive estimator is highly dependent on the specific recursive formula employed, the initial conditions set, and the characteristics of the survey data. While some recursive estimators are designed to be unbiased or asymptotically unbiased, meaning the bias diminishes as the sample size increases 2, others may exhibit bias, particularly in smaller samples or if the underlying model guiding the recursion is misspecified. The choice of the initial value in the recursive process can also introduce bias if it is not appropriately chosen. A fundamental consideration when evaluating recursive estimators is the potential trade-off between bias and variance 7, where efforts to reduce bias might inadvertently increase variance, and vice versa.
Variance measures the variability or dispersion of the estimator's values around its expected value across different possible samples. A lower variance indicates greater precision in the estimates. For many recursive estimators, the variance tends to decrease as more data is incorporated into the recursive process, leading to more stable and precise estimates over time.8 For instance, in the recursive estimation of a constant using least squares, the variance of the estimate decreases as the number of observations increases. The variance of a recursive estimator can be mathematically analyzed and quantified, as demonstrated in the derivation of the variance of the estimated variance for a Gaussian distribution.2 Understanding the variance is crucial for assessing the reliability of the estimates and constructing confidence intervals.
Consistency is a critical property indicating whether the estimator converges in probability to the true value of the population parameter as the sample size approaches infinity. Many recursive estimators are designed to be consistent under certain conditions. This typically requires that the recursive formula effectively integrates new information and that the influence of the initial conditions diminishes as more data is processed. However, consistency is not always guaranteed and can depend on specific conditions related to the data and the formulation of the recursive process.9 Factors such as model misspecification or poorly chosen initial conditions can potentially impede consistency. While recursive estimation algorithms can be used to improve the robustness of a model within the sample period 1, establishing consistency requires rigorous theoretical analysis.
5. Advantages of Employing Recursive Estimators in Sample Surveys
Recursive estimators offer several compelling advantages that make them increasingly valuable in the context of sample surveys.
One significant advantage is computational efficiency.1 Unlike batch methods that may require reprocessing the entire dataset with each new observation, recursive methods update estimates incrementally using only the new data and the previous estimate. This can lead to substantial savings in processing time and computational resources, particularly when dealing with large or continuously arriving survey data.10 The update step in many recursive estimators involves a fixed number of operations, independent of the total number of data points already processed, further enhancing efficiency.
Recursive methods also typically have reduced memory requirements.1 Batch methods often necessitate storing the entire raw dataset in memory. In contrast, recursive estimators might only need to store the previous estimate and a few parameters or summary statistics for the update. This reduced need to retain past raw data is especially beneficial when analyzing very large datasets or in resource-constrained environments.
The sequential nature of recursive estimators makes them inherently suitable for online estimation and real-time updates.1 In longitudinal surveys or studies with continuous data collection, estimates can be updated immediately as new data becomes available.11 This capability is crucial for monitoring trends, detecting anomalies, and making timely decisions based on the most current information.
In repeated surveys, recursive methods, particularly in the form of composite estimators, can potentially lead to improved efficiency.4 These estimators leverage information from previous survey periods to enhance the precision of current estimates by exploiting correlations between measurements over time. Recursive formulas are often used to combine data from different time points, resulting in lower variance and mean squared error.
6. Disadvantages and Limitations of Recursive Estimators in Sample Surveys
Despite their advantages, recursive estimators also have certain disadvantages and limitations that need careful consideration in the context of sample surveys.
One notable limitation is their sensitivity to initial conditions or starting values.2 The initial estimate or parameters used to begin the recursive process can significantly influence subsequent estimates and the overall convergence of the algorithm. A poor initial choice can lead to slow convergence, convergence to an incorrect value, or even instability.
There is also the potential for error propagation across iterations.20 Since each estimate in a recursive process builds upon the previous one, any errors introduced early on can be carried forward and potentially amplified in later steps, affecting the overall accuracy and reliability of the final estimates.
The theoretical analysis and derivation of statistical properties for recursive estimators can be considerably complex.9 Obtaining closed-form expressions for bias, variance, and consistency, especially for non-linear recursive estimators or those applied to complex survey designs, often requires advanced statistical techniques and might not always be feasible.
Furthermore, recursive estimators that rely on a specific underlying model or assumptions about the data can produce biased results if those assumptions are incorrect.21 The sequential updating will then be based on a flawed foundation, leading to estimates that systematically deviate from the true population parameters.
7. Illustrative Examples of Recursive Estimators in Sample Survey Practice
Recursive estimators find practical application in various aspects of sample surveys.
Recursive variance estimation is crucial in multistage sampling designs. Algorithms like the one by Bellhouse (1985), implemented in the svyrecvar() function of R's survey package 23, allow for efficient computation of variance by recursively combining variance components from each sampling stage. This avoids the computational burden of direct methods, especially in complex designs. Even for fundamental estimators like the Horvitz-Thompson estimator, variance estimation can be performed recursively, particularly for large samples.25
Composite estimation in panel surveys with sample rotation heavily relies on recursive estimators.4 Surveys like the U.S. Current Population Survey and the Canadian Labour Force Survey use recursive formulas to combine estimates from different rotation groups and time periods, improving the precision of both level and change estimates.
In small area estimation and time series surveys, recursive techniques such as Kalman filtering can be employed.10 These methods combine information sequentially over time or across related areas to enhance the reliability of estimates, particularly when direct survey data is sparse.
Network scale-up methods for estimating hidden populations utilize recursive back estimation.32 This involves iteratively refining estimates by removing poorly performing predictors based on comparisons with known population sizes for certain groups.
8. Comparison of Recursive Estimators with Traditional Survey Estimators
Recursive estimators offer a distinct approach to estimation in sample surveys when compared to traditional methods like the Horvitz-Thompson estimator and Generalized Regression (GREG) estimators.
The Horvitz-Thompson (HT) estimator is a cornerstone of design-based inference, providing an unbiased estimate of the population total.25 However, it can suffer from high variance, especially with unequal probability sampling.40 Recursive estimators, particularly model-assisted ones, often aim to reduce this variance, although this might come with the risk of introducing bias if the underlying model is misspecified. In some cases, recursion is even used to estimate the variance of the HT estimator.25 The choice between HT and a recursive estimator depends on the specific survey goals, prioritizing unbiasedness versus efficiency and the need for handling sequential data.
Generalized Regression (GREG) estimators are model-assisted estimators that utilize auxiliary information to improve efficiency.38 Traditional GREG estimation is typically a batch process. Recursive regression estimators offer a sequential alternative, updating the regression model and estimates as new data arrives, which can be advantageous in dynamic settings or with limited computational resources.45 While GREG estimators are known for their design consistency, recursive model-based estimators must also aim to preserve this property.
Other composite estimators used in repeated surveys often share the goal of efficiency improvement with recursive composite estimators.4 Many composite estimators have an inherent recursive structure, allowing for efficient updating of estimates as new survey waves are completed. This recursive formulation is often key to their computational efficiency and adaptability to population changes over time.
Estimator Type	Bias	Variance	Consistency	Computational Efficiency	Memory Requirements	Suitability	
Recursive	Depends on formula, can be asymptotically unbiased	Often decreases with more data	Often consistent under certain conditions	High for sequential data	Low	Large datasets, online analysis, repeated surveys, dynamic populations	
Horvitz-Thompson	Design-unbiased	Can be high, especially with unequal probability	Consistent	Can be computationally intensive for variance	High	Design-based inference, emphasis on unbiasedness	
Generalized Regression	Model-assisted, design-consistent	Lower than HT when model is well-specified	Consistent	Batch processing	High	Utilizing auxiliary information to improve efficiency	
Composite	Can be designed to be approximately unbiased	Lower than single-period estimators in panel surveys	Often consistent in repeated survey settings	Efficient for updates	Moderate	Repeated surveys with overlapping samples, estimating levels and changes	
Table 1: Comparison of Estimator Properties
Application Area	Recursive Estimator Example	Key Features/Benefits	
Multistage Variance Estimation	Bellhouse Algorithm (in R survey package)	Efficient computation of variance in complex designs	
Composite Estimation (Panel Surveys)	AK-Composite Estimator (e.g., in CPS), Regression Composite Estimators	Improved precision for level and change estimates by leveraging temporal correlations	
Small Area/Time Series Surveys	Kalman Filter, Sequential Updating Methods	Improved estimates by combining information over time or across related areas	
Network Scale-Up Methods	Recursive Back Estimation	Refined estimates of hidden population size by iteratively removing poor predictors	
Table 2: Examples of Recursive Estimators in Survey Practice
9. Conclusion
Recursive estimators represent a powerful and versatile class of estimation techniques in the realm of sample survey statistics. Characterized by their sequential updating nature, they offer a compelling alternative to traditional batch estimators, particularly in the context of increasingly large, complex, and dynamic survey data. These methods, encompassing various mathematical formulations tailored to specific parameters and survey designs, exhibit key statistical properties such as the potential for asymptotic unbiasedness, a tendency for variance to decrease with accumulating data, and consistency under appropriate conditions.
The advantages of employing recursive estimators are manifold, including significant computational and memory efficiency, making them well-suited for analyzing massive datasets and for online, real-time analysis. Their ability to leverage temporal correlations in repeated surveys through composite estimation further enhances the precision of estimates. These benefits are particularly salient in modern survey practices that grapple with longitudinal data, continuous data streams, and the need for timely insights.
However, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent disadvantages and limitations of recursive estimators. Their sensitivity to initial conditions, the potential for error propagation across iterations, the complexity involved in their theoretical analysis, and the risk of bias stemming from incorrect underlying models necessitate careful consideration and implementation.
Recursive estimators find practical application across a spectrum of survey scenarios, from the complex variance estimation in multistage designs to the nuanced estimation of population levels and changes in panel surveys with sample rotation. They also prove invaluable in specialized areas like small area estimation, time series analysis of survey data, and the estimation of hidden populations using network scale-up methods.
When comparing recursive estimators with traditional survey estimators like the Horvitz-Thompson and GREG estimators, the choice often involves balancing design unbiasedness with efficiency and the ability to handle sequential data. While HT estimators prioritize unbiasedness, recursive methods often focus on enhancing efficiency and adapting to dynamic data environments. GREG estimators utilize auxiliary information for improved precision, and recursive regression offers a sequential counterpart. Composite estimators, frequently recursive in nature, are specifically designed to exploit temporal correlations in repeated surveys.
In conclusion, recursive estimators play an increasingly vital role in modern survey statistics. Their ability to efficiently process and adapt to evolving data streams makes them indispensable for a wide range of applications. However, their successful implementation requires a thorough understanding of their properties, careful attention to initial conditions and model validation, and a thoughtful consideration of their strengths and limitations in the context of the specific survey objectives and data characteristics. Future research could focus on developing more robust recursive methods for intricate survey designs and exploring the integration of advanced statistical and machine learning techniques to further enhance their capabilities and applicability.
Works cited
1.	RECURSIVE ESTIMATION ALGORITHMS FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c10407/c10407.pdf
2.	Estimation of variance by a recursive equation - NASA Technical Reports Server, accessed May 10, 2025, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19690028796/downloads/19690028796.pdf
3.	Recursive estimation, accessed May 10, 2025, https://lewisgroup.uta.edu/ee5327/lectures/RecursiveEstim.pdf
4.	Optimal Recursive Estimation for Repeated Surveys, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/12-001-x/1998001/article/3907-eng.pdf
5.	Recursive Estimation in Econometrics, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.le.ac.uk/users/dsgp1/SIGNALS/RECURSE.pdf
6.	Recursive Bayesian estimation - Wikipedia, accessed May 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recursive_Bayesian_estimation
7.	Properties of Estimators: Bias, Variance, and Consistency - YouTube, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQ9wDHp49PE
8.	Recursive Identification, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.it.uu.se/edu/course/homepage/systemid/vt12/ch8.pdf
9.	Recursive Estimation in Large Panel Data Models: Theory and Practice - Monash University, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.monash.edu/business/ebs/research/publications/ebs/wp05-17.pdf
10.	Recursive Estimation of Volatility for High Frequency Financial Data, accessed May 10, 2025, https://csu.gov.cz/docs/107508/01f4d84c-26f5-6b5f-e806-73f6112cb2d9/32019721q3_296-311_vejmelka_analyses.pdf?version=1.0
11.	Application of Recursive Estimation to Heat Tracing for Groundwater/Surface‐Water Exchange - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed May 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9257602/
12.	Real-time recursive estimation of, and uncertainty quantification for, breath alcohol concentration via LQ tracking control-based inverse filtering of transdermal alcohol biosensor signals - American Institute of Mathematical Sciences, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.aimsciences.org/article/doi/10.3934/ammc.2024003
13.	Composite estimator based on the recursive ratio for an arbitrary rotation scheme: Mathematical Population Studies - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08898480.2018.1477385
14.	Composite estimator based on the recursive ratio for an arbitrary rotation scheme, accessed May 10, 2025, https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/mpopst/v25y2018i4p227-247.html
15.	Composite estimator based on the recursive ratio for an arbitrary rotation scheme - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08898480.2018.1477385
16.	Exploring recursion for optimal estimators under cascade rotation, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/12-001-x/2015001/article/14192-eng.pdf
17.	A Regression Composite Estimator with Application to the Canadian Labour Force Survey, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/12-001-x/2001001/article/5853-eng.pdf
18.	A New Approach to Composite Estimation for Repeated Surveys with Rotating Panels - American Statistical Association, accessed May 10, 2025, https://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/proceedings/2021/data/assets/pdf/1913757.pdf
19.	A New Approach to Composite Estimation for Repeated Surveys with Rotating Panels, accessed May 10, 2025, http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2021/files/1913757.pdf
20.	Recursive Position Estimation in Sensor Networks, accessed May 10, 2025, https://web.cs.ucla.edu/~lixia/papers/01ICNP_GPS.pdf
21.	Non-recursive models - University of Notre Dame, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/stats2/l93x.pdf
22.	Recursive and direct multi-step forecasting: the best of both worlds - Rob J Hyndman, accessed May 10, 2025, https://robjhyndman.com/papers/rectify.pdf
23.	Understanding the code used to implement the {survey} package's recursive variance estimation for multistage samples - Practical Significance, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.practicalsignificance.com/posts/understanding-the-survey-packages-recursive-algorithm/
24.	Variance estimation for multistage surveys - R, accessed May 10, 2025, https://r-survey.r-forge.r-project.org/survey/html/svyrecvar.html
25.	Variance estimation for complex statistics and estimators: Linearization and residual techniques - Statistique Canada, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/12-001-x/1999002/article/4882-eng.pdf
26.	J.N.K. Rao: His Contributions to Survey Methodology at Statistics Canada, accessed May 10, 2025, https://ssc.ca/sites/default/files/survey/documents/SSC2001_M_Hidiroglou.pdf
27.	Recursive Estimation and Time Series Analysis: An Introduction - ResearchGate, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261176890_Recursive_Estimation_and_Time_Series_Analysis_An_Introduction
28.	RECURSIVE ESTIMATION IN AUTOREGRESSIvE MODELS WITH ADDITIVE OUTLIERS - Kybernetika, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.kybernetika.cz/content/1993/1/62/paper.pdf
29.	Recursive Methods and their Modifications for Time Series with Outliers and Missing Observations - Dialnet, accessed May 10, 2025, https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/118332.pdf
30.	Recursive Estimation Based on ARMA Models - Project Euclid, accessed May 10, 2025, https://projecteuclid.org/journals/annals-of-statistics/volume-8/issue-4/Recursive-Estimation-Based-on-ARMA-Models/10.1214/aos/1176345069.full
31.	accessed December 31, 1969, https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Small+Area+Estimation%20%2D%202nd+Edition-p-9781118735850
32.	Recursive Back Estimation Process to Identify and Eliminate Poor... | Download Table - ResearchGate, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Recursive-Back-Estimation-Process-to-Identify-and-Eliminate-Poor-Predictors-Using-the_tbl2_285584858
33.	Improving the Network Scale-Up Estimator: Incorporating Means of Sums, Recursive Back Estimation, and Sampling Weights | PLOS One, accessed May 10, 2025, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143406
34.	Improving the Network Scale-Up Estimator: Incorporating Means of Sums, Recursive Back Estimation, and Sampling Weights - DigitalCommons@UNL, accessed May 10, 2025, https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1285&context=sociologyfacpub
35.	(PDF) Improving the Network Scale-Up Estimator: Incorporating Means of Sums, Recursive Back Estimation, and Sampling Weights - ResearchGate, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285584858_Improving_the_Network_Scale-Up_Estimator_Incorporating_Means_of_Sums_Recursive_Back_Estimation_and_Sampling_Weights
36.	Improving the Network Scale-Up Estimator: Incorporating Means of Sums, Recursive Back Estimation, and Sampling Weights - PubMed, accessed May 10, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26630261/
37.	Horowitz-Thompson estimators explained simply - Cross Validated - Stack Exchange, accessed May 10, 2025, https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/593067/horowitz-thompson-estimators-explained-simply
38.	Design-unbiased statistical learning in survey sampling 1 Introduction - ePrints Soton, accessed May 10, 2025, https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/444553/1/SL.pdf
39.	Model-Assisted Survey Estimation with Modern Prediction Techniques - Project Euclid, accessed May 10, 2025, https://projecteuclid.org/journals/statistical-science/volume-32/issue-2/Model-Assisted-Survey-Estimation-with-Modern-Prediction-Techniques/10.1214/16-STS589.pdf
40.	On the Convergence of the Horvitz‐Thompson Estimator - ResearchGate, accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230362656_On_the_Convergence_of_the_Horvitz-Thompson_Estimator
41.	Comparing the Horvitz-Thompson estimator and Hajek estimator, accessed May 10, 2025, https://ftp.eenet.ee/pub/cran/web/packages/sampling/vignettes/HT_Hajek_estimators.pdf
42.	Estimating the Variance of the Horvitz-Thompson Estimator - Open Research Repository, accessed May 10, 2025, https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstreams/76479b29-a41b-4b98-868c-4a6e871702d2/download
43.	BU-935-MA - eCommons@Cornell, accessed May 10, 2025, https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/33049/BU-935-MA.Revised.pdf?sequence=1
44.	Design-unbiased statistical learning in survey sampling - arXiv, accessed May 10, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.11423
45.	SURVEY METHODOL, accessed May 10, 2025, https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/statcan/12-001/CS12-001-24-1-eng.pdf
46.	Model-assisted estimation in high-dimensional settings for survey data - PMC, accessed May 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9930821/