Advancements in High-Resolution Remote Sensing for National Forest Inventories: Applications, Accuracies, and Adoption Barriers
1. Introduction: The Evolving Landscape of National Forest Inventories with High-Resolution Remote Sensing
The Critical Role of NFIs
National Forest Inventories (NFIs) serve as the bedrock of natural resource monitoring systems, furnishing indispensable data crucial for effective forest management, informed decision-making, and the formulation of sound policies.1 These inventories are fundamental in supporting national forestry objectives and fulfilling international reporting commitments, such as those to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Food and Agriculture Organization's (FAO) Forest Resource Assessment.2 Historically, the primary focus of NFIs was on quantifying timber resources; however, their scope has significantly broadened over time to encompass a more extensive array of ecosystem services, biodiversity metrics, and carbon dynamics.5
Traditional NFI methodologies, which often rely on periodic field sampling, encounter inherent limitations concerning scalability, the frequency of updates, logistical complexities, and their capacity to capture rapid ecological transformations, particularly across vast, remote, or otherwise inaccessible forested regions.3 This evolution in the demands placed upon NFIs reflects a broader paradigm shift. NFIs are transitioning from being static, timber-centric inventories to becoming dynamic, ecosystem-wide monitoring systems. This change is not merely technological; it is a conceptual transformation that profoundly impacts how forest resources are valued, managed, and conserved in an era of accelerating environmental change. The historical reliance on sample-based, aspatial estimates focused predominantly on wood resources 6 is giving way to a pressing need for spatially explicit data covering a wider spectrum of ecological attributes—including carbon stocks, biodiversity indicators, and disturbance patterns—all requiring higher temporal frequencies to capture their dynamic nature.2
The Transformative Potential of High-Resolution Remote Sensing
High-resolution remote sensing technologies offer cost-effective, scalable, and non-invasive methodologies to augment and significantly enhance the capabilities of NFIs.8 These technologies facilitate practical data collection for both qualitative and quantitative observations of forests and land attributes.8 The integration of remote sensing is fundamentally reshaping NFIs, moving them from entities primarily reliant on statistical sampling towards spatially comprehensive monitoring systems. This shift directly addresses the escalating demand from policymakers, resource managers, and the scientific community for spatially explicit forest data.7 The provision of detailed spatial (often sub-meter to 30-meter resolution), spectral, and temporal information by high-resolution systems enables more precise, timely, and comprehensive assessments of diverse forest attributes.11
The increasing availability of free and open remote sensing data, exemplified by archives such as Landsat and the operational Sentinel missions, coupled with the advent of powerful cloud computing platforms like Google Earth Engine (GEE), is democratizing access to advanced NFI methodologies.1 This democratization, however, presents a nuanced challenge: while technological barriers to data acquisition and initial processing are diminishing, a "capacity chasm" may be widening. Effective utilization of these rich data resources and sophisticated analytical tools still demands substantial technical expertise, robust computational infrastructure, and supportive institutional frameworks.1 Developing countries, for instance, despite often receiving international support for NFI enhancement, frequently face difficulties in achieving long-term sustainability and independently repeating remote sensing-enhanced inventory cycles.3 This suggests that while the technology itself becomes more accessible, the capacity to translate these technological advancements into consistent, operational NFI improvements is unevenly distributed globally. Such disparities could potentially lead to significant variations in national reporting capabilities and, consequently, in the effectiveness of forest management and conservation strategies worldwide.
Purpose and Structure of the Report
This report aims to provide an expert-level synthesis of the recent applications, reported accuracies, and institutional adoption barriers associated with high-resolution remote sensing technologies within the context of National Forest Inventories. The subsequent sections will delve into the key remote sensing technologies and their derived products relevant to NFIs, explore their diverse applications in contemporary forest monitoring, critically assess their performance based on reported accuracy metrics, analyze the multifaceted challenges hindering their widespread institutional adoption, and finally, discuss solutions and future directions for optimizing their integration into operational NFI programs. The analysis draws upon recent scientific literature, technical reports, and illustrative case studies to present a comprehensive overview of this rapidly evolving field.
2. High-Resolution Remote Sensing Technologies and Derived Products for NFIs
Defining High-Resolution Remote Sensing for NFIs
In the context of National Forest Inventories, "high-resolution remote sensing" encompasses a suite of technologies capable of providing detailed spatial, spectral, and temporal information. This level of detail is crucial for characterizing a wide array of forest attributes at multiple scales, ranging from individual trees to entire landscapes.8 Typically, this includes spatial resolutions from sub-meter to approximately 30 meters. These technologies comprise both active sensors, such as Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), and passive sensors, primarily optical multispectral and hyperspectral imagers.8 The choice of sensor and platform depends on the specific NFI objectives, target attributes, cost considerations, and the environmental conditions of the area of interest.
LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging)
LiDAR is an active remote sensing technology that operates by emitting laser pulses and measuring the time taken for these pulses to return to the sensor after reflecting off surfaces. This process generates precise three-dimensional (3D) point clouds that meticulously map the forest structure and the underlying terrain.8
●	Platforms:
○	Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS): ALS is extensively utilized in operational NFIs and for detailed forest management inventories. It provides comprehensive 3D structural data over large geographical extents.17 Point densities from ALS can be very high (e.g., exceeding 100 points per square meter (pts/m2) in specific research applications), although densities of 1 to 10 pts/m2 are more typical for broad-area operational surveys.20
○	UAV-LiDAR: LiDAR sensors mounted on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) can generate exceptionally high-density point clouds 20, making them ideal for detailed tree-level or plot-scale assessments. UAV-LiDAR represents a cost-effective and agile alternative for surveying smaller, targeted areas.8
○	Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS): TLS systems are ground-based and capture highly accurate, detailed structural data from beneath the forest canopy. While providing rich information, TLS data acquisition can be time-consuming and is often affected by occlusion, where parts of trees or the terrain are hidden from the scanner's view.12
○	Mobile Laser Scanning (MLS): MLS systems, which can be handheld or mounted on vehicles, offer faster data acquisition compared to TLS while maintaining good accuracy for many NFI-relevant variables such as tree position and diameter at breast height (DBH).29
○	Spaceborne LiDAR (e.g., GEDI, ICESat-2): Missions like NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) and ICESat-2 provide global, albeit spatially sparser, sampling of forest structure. These are invaluable for large-scale biomass estimation and canopy height mapping.33 GEDI, for instance, delivers full-waveform LiDAR data with footprints approximately 25 meters in diameter.34
●	Key Derived Products: LiDAR data processing yields a variety of critical NFI products, including Digital Terrain Models (DTMs) representing the bare earth surface, Digital Surface Models (DSMs) capturing the top of the canopy, and Canopy Height Models (CHMs) derived by subtracting the DTM from the DSM. Furthermore, LiDAR enables Individual Tree Detection (ITD), providing parameters such as tree height and crown dimensions. It is also used to derive numerous forest structural metrics like canopy cover, tree density, and vertical canopy profiles, which are essential inputs for estimating above-ground biomass (AGB) and carbon stocks.8
High-Resolution Optical Satellite Imagery
Optical satellite sensors passively measure solar radiation reflected from the Earth's surface, providing valuable information across different spectral bands.
●	Sensor Types: This category includes a range of multispectral and panchromatic imagers aboard satellites such as Ikonos, Quickbird, GeoEye, Pleiades, Kompsat, and the WorldView series (e.g., WorldView-2 offers eight spectral bands). More recently, freely available data from missions like Sentinel-2 (providing 10-20 meter resolution imagery, including crucial red-edge bands) and commercial constellations like PlanetScope (offering daily 3-meter resolution imagery) have significantly expanded NFI capabilities.7
●	Spectral Characteristics: These sensors capture reflectance data across the visible, near-infrared (NIR), and shortwave infrared (SWIR) portions of the electromagnetic spectrum. This spectral information is vital for assessing vegetation health, discriminating between tree species, and monitoring overall forest condition.18
●	Derived Products: A wide array of products relevant to NFIs are derived from high-resolution optical imagery. These include detailed Land Cover/Land Use (LULC) maps, forest area delineations, forest type classifications, and tree species distribution maps. Vegetation indices, such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), are commonly calculated to assess vegetation vigor. Optical data are also crucial for producing forest health indicators and mapping disturbances like fires and deforestation, as well as estimating canopy cover.7
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Satellite Imagery
SAR systems are active microwave sensors that transmit radar pulses and record the backscattered signal, offering unique capabilities for forest monitoring.
●	Principles: SAR's primary advantages include its ability to operate under all-weather conditions, day and night, and its sensitivity to forest structural attributes, moisture content, and biomass.18 Different SAR frequencies (e.g., X-band, C-band, L-band, P-band) interact differently with forest components.
●	Sensor Types: Notable SAR missions include Cosmo-SkyMed and TerraSAR-X (X-band, capable of 1-meter resolution), Sentinel-1 (C-band, providing systematic global coverage), ALOS PALSAR (L-band, with better penetration into forest canopies), and the upcoming BIOMASS mission (P-band, specifically designed for forest biomass estimation).9
●	Derived Products: SAR data are used to generate forest cover maps, estimate AGB (particularly with L-band and P-band data due to their deeper penetration and sensitivity to woody biomass), detect disturbances such as logging and deforestation, and assess soil moisture. SAR can also provide valuable information on forest structure.9
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs/Drones)
UAVs have emerged as highly versatile platforms for acquiring very high-resolution, site-specific data for forestry applications.
●	Platforms & Sensors: UAVs can be equipped with a diverse array of lightweight sensors, including standard RGB (Red, Green, Blue) cameras, multispectral and hyperspectral imagers, and compact LiDAR systems.8 Their flexibility allows for data collection on demand and tailored to specific project needs.
●	Applications: UAVs are increasingly employed in precision forestry for tree-level monitoring and detailed plot assessments. They are highly effective for mapping forest health issues (e.g., pest and disease outbreaks at early stages), conducting post-disturbance damage assessments, inventorying plantations (e.g., assessing tree survival rates and estimating volume), and detailed forest degradation assessments, such as quantifying felling gaps and skid trails.8
The current trajectory in remote sensing for NFIs clearly points towards an increasing reliance on multi-sensor data fusion and integration. This approach is driven by the understanding that the inherent limitations of any single sensor type can often be effectively compensated by the strengths of others, ultimately leading to more robust, accurate, and comprehensive characterizations of forest ecosystems. For instance, optical data, while providing rich spectral information for species discrimination and health assessment, are hampered by cloud cover and do not directly measure vertical forest structure.19 SAR systems can penetrate cloud cover and are sensitive to structure and moisture, but their signals can saturate in high-biomass forests, and the interaction of microwaves with complex forest canopies can be intricate.19 LiDAR directly measures 3D structure with high precision, but airborne and UAV-based LiDAR campaigns can be costly for extensive national coverage, and spaceborne LiDAR missions currently offer sparse, albeit valuable, sampling.20 Consequently, numerous studies demonstrate improved results when these data types are fused: combining LiDAR with optical imagery enhances tree species classification 19, and integrating SAR with optical data improves LULC mapping and biomass estimation.45 This implies that future NFI systems will increasingly depend on sophisticated data fusion workflows, which in turn necessitates advanced analytical skills and enhanced data processing capabilities within NFI agencies.
Furthermore, the proliferation of UAV technology is carving out a new and distinct scale for NFI-relevant data acquisition: ultra-high resolution information at the plot-to-local scale. This capability is instrumental in bridging the observational gap that often exists between traditional, intensive field plots and broader, coarser-resolution satellite or aerial surveys.8 The centimeter-level resolution achievable with UAVs provides unprecedented detail for specific sites, which is invaluable for calibrating and validating data from coarser resolution sensors, conducting detailed assessments of localized disturbances, and supporting precision forestry applications that can inform NFI frameworks.8 However, the operationalization of UAV data for comprehensive national-scale NFIs faces significant hurdles. These include limitations in areal coverage per flight, overall cost-effectiveness when considering very large territories, the sheer volume of data generated requiring substantial processing and storage, and the challenge of ensuring consistent methodologies and data quality across numerous small-area acquisitions.12 This suggests that UAVs are likely to fill a critical niche within a hierarchical NFI data collection strategy, serving as a tool for intensive monitoring in priority areas or for detailed calibration and validation campaigns, rather than as a replacement for sensors designed for large-area coverage. The primary challenge, therefore, lies in effectively and coherently integrating these diverse multi-scale datasets into a unified NFI system.
3. Recent Applications of High-Resolution Remote Sensing in National Forest Inventories
The integration of high-resolution remote sensing into NFIs has catalyzed a wide range of applications, transforming how forest resources are mapped, monitored, and managed. These applications leverage the unique capabilities of different sensor types to provide more detailed, timely, and spatially explicit information than traditional field-based methods alone.
Enhanced Forest Mapping and Inventory
A primary application of remote sensing in NFIs is the direct observation and estimation of forest area and the classification of forest types.10 High-resolution optical imagery, such as data from Sentinel-2 and PlanetScope, along with SAR data from missions like Sentinel-1, are frequently employed. These are often combined with advanced machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest and various deep learning architectures, for robust LULC mapping and the discrimination of different forest types.7 For example, Canada's Satellite-Based Forest Inventory (SBFI) utilizes Landsat imagery and image segmentation techniques to achieve stand-level characterization of forest resources.7
Stand delineation and characterization also benefit significantly from high-resolution data. In Canada's NFI, photo-interpretation of very high-resolution (VHR) imagery, acquired from either aircraft or satellites, is a standard method for delineating homogenous forest stands.7 LiDAR data, with its ability to capture detailed 3D structure, plays a crucial role in creating enhanced forest inventories that offer high levels of spatial and structural detail, moving beyond simple area delineation to quantitative structural assessment.7
Forest Structure and Biomass/Carbon Estimation
Understanding forest structure is fundamental to assessing biomass and carbon stocks. LiDAR technology, whether deployed from airborne platforms, UAVs, or spaceborne missions like GEDI, is paramount for reliably measuring key structural attributes such as tree height, canopy vertical structure, and canopy density.8 Spaceborne LiDAR, particularly GEDI, provides globally consistent, albeit sampled, measurements of canopy height and vertical structure profiles, which are invaluable for large-scale assessments.34 The democratization of access to such 3D forest structure data through missions like GEDI is particularly crucial for enabling consistent large-area biomass and carbon accounting. While airborne LiDAR provides high-density data, its cost can be prohibitive for comprehensive national coverage.20 GEDI offers a globally consistent alternative, providing footprint-based measurements of canopy height and structure.33 This information is invaluable for calibrating models and providing reference data in regions lacking extensive ALS coverage.33 However, the sparse, footprint-based nature of GEDI's sampling 34 necessitates its integration with wall-to-wall optical or SAR data (e.g., Landsat, Sentinel) to create continuous, spatially explicit map products, as demonstrated by research integrating GEDI with Landsat for global canopy height mapping.33 This highlights a significant trend towards the synergistic use of different satellite missions, where accurate vertical structure information from sampling systems like GEDI enhances models based on continuous-coverage optical or SAR data, thereby improving the reliability of national and global biomass and carbon maps.
Consequently, LiDAR is a cornerstone technology for AGB estimation, with derived structural metrics frequently used as predictors in allometric models or machine learning frameworks.8 SAR data, especially from L-band and P-band sensors due to their greater penetration depth, are also employed for AGB estimation, often fused with optical or LiDAR data. However, C-band SAR tends to saturate in high-biomass forests, limiting its utility for direct AGB quantification in such environments.9 The integration of field inventory data with remote sensing measurements remains crucial for calibrating models and scaling up biomass estimates from plot or footprint level to regional and national scales.9
Forest Health and Disturbance Monitoring
The capacity of high-resolution remote sensing to monitor forest health and disturbances is increasingly vital, especially in the context of climate change and intensified human pressures. Satellite imagery, including data from Sentinel-2, and UAV-based systems equipped with multispectral or hyperspectral sensors, are effectively used to detect forest degradation resulting from pest infestations and diseases. This is achieved by analyzing subtle changes in spectral reflectance and derived vegetation indices that indicate physiological stress in trees.8 UAVs, in particular, allow for tree-level assessment of stress symptoms, enabling early detection and targeted management responses.49
For fire disturbance, satellite imagery from platforms like Landsat, Sentinel-2, PlanetScope, and WorldView is routinely used for post-fire assessments. These data enable the mapping of burn severity and extent using spectral indices such as the Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR).8 LiDAR technology contributes by mapping ground-level wood debris, which can inform fire risk assessments, and by quantifying post-fire impacts on forest structure.28
Remote sensing is also indispensable for the spatially explicit observation of changes in forest types and the assessment of degradation due to activities like logging over large areas.10 UAVs are particularly useful for detailed evaluations of logging impacts, such as quantifying felling gaps and the extent of skid trails.47 LiDAR can be employed to assess the volume of felled trees, providing quantitative data on timber removal.28 Furthermore, data from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 are being evaluated for their potential in detecting selective logging activities, which are often challenging to identify with coarser resolution imagery.9
Following disturbances, time-series satellite data from missions like Landsat and Sentinel are critical for monitoring forest recovery and regeneration processes. These long-term datasets allow for the tracking of vegetation regrowth, changes in species composition, and the overall trajectory of ecosystem recovery over time.7 This dynamic monitoring capability is a significant advancement for NFIs, moving them beyond static inventories to systems that can track and assess forest change processes. This shift is driven by the urgent need for timely information on forest dynamics to support adaptive management and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies.4 Traditional NFIs, with their periodic snapshots 4, are often insufficient to capture the rapid pace of these changes. Remote sensing technologies, especially satellite time series and responsive UAV deployments, offer the capability for frequent, and in some cases near real-time, observation.1 Consequently, applications focused on disturbance mapping and recovery monitoring are becoming increasingly central to NFI programs.7 This implies that NFIs must continue to evolve their data acquisition pipelines, analytical processing workflows, and information dissemination strategies to support proactive management and rapid response capabilities, rather than solely retrospective assessments.
Tree Species Identification and Biodiversity Assessment
Identifying tree species and assessing biodiversity are challenging but crucial tasks for NFIs. Multispectral and hyperspectral imagery, acquired from satellite or UAV platforms, are increasingly used for this purpose. These data, often combined with LiDAR-derived structural information for context, allow for the discrimination of tree species based on their unique spectral signatures and canopy characteristics.8 Advanced machine learning, particularly deep learning models like Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Transformer-based architectures (e.g., Presto), are being applied with growing success to automate and improve the accuracy of tree species classification from complex remote sensing datasets.65 Beyond species identification, LiDAR-derived structural metrics, such as canopy heterogeneity and vertical complexity, can serve as valuable proxies for assessing habitat suitability and biodiversity.22
Integration with AI and Machine Learning
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) is revolutionizing how remote sensing data are processed and analyzed within NFIs. ML algorithms such as Random Forest, Support Vector Machines (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and Extreme Random Trees (ERT) are widely employed for various classification and regression tasks. These include estimating forest age, predicting AGB, and classifying tree species from diverse remote sensing inputs.9
More recently, Deep Learning (DL) techniques, including CNNs, U-Net architectures, and Transformer models like Presto, are significantly advancing capabilities in image segmentation, object detection (e.g., individual tree crowns), and complex classification tasks such as detailed tree species mapping and subtle disturbance detection.42 The application of AI/ML, especially DL, is not merely enhancing the accuracy of existing NFI products; it is also enabling the extraction of novel and more granular information that was previously impractical to obtain at scale. This includes, for example, the identification of individual tree species within highly diverse and complex forest stands, or the early detection of physiological stress indicators related to pests or drought.49 By automatically learning complex patterns from vast quantities of multi-source remote sensing data, these advanced algorithms are facilitating a move towards individual tree level information products.8 This signifies that AI/ML is a key enabler for realizing "precision forestry" concepts within the broader NFI context, offering richer datasets that can feed into ecological modeling, biodiversity assessments, and the planning of targeted management interventions. However, this advancement also brings challenges related to the substantial data requirements for training robust models, ensuring model interpretability, and validating model transferability across different geographic regions and forest conditions.
Role of Cloud Computing Platforms (e.g., GEE, AWS)
Cloud computing platforms are playing an increasingly pivotal role in facilitating the processing of the massive remote sensing datasets required for modern NFI applications. Platforms like Google Earth Engine (GEE), Amazon Web Services (AWS), and Microsoft Azure provide the necessary computational power and storage infrastructure, enabling large-scale and near real-time forest monitoring.1 GEE, for instance, is widely used for tasks such as LULC mapping, monitoring agricultural crop intensity, and mapping natural hazards, all of which can be relevant to NFI contexts.14 The US FIA program's BIGMAP project, for example, leverages AWS for its data processing and dissemination needs.1
4. Accuracy Assessment of High-Resolution Remote Sensing Products in NFI Contexts
The utility of high-resolution remote sensing products in NFIs is critically dependent on their accuracy. Rigorous accuracy assessment, typically involving comparison against independent reference data often derived from NFI field plots, is essential for understanding the reliability of these products and for building user confidence.23 Common metrics employed in these assessments include Overall Accuracy (OA), the Kappa coefficient (a measure of agreement adjusted for chance), Producer's Accuracy (equivalent to recall or sensitivity), User's Accuracy (equivalent to precision), the F1-score (the harmonic mean of precision and recall), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for continuous variables, the coefficient of determination (R2) indicating the proportion of variance explained, and bias.23
Reported Accuracies for Key Forest Attributes
The reported accuracies for various NFI-relevant attributes derived from high-resolution remote sensing are diverse, reflecting the wide range of sensors, methodologies, forest types, and validation approaches used.
●	Canopy Height:
○	GEDI L2A: For canopy height (specifically the RH98 metric, representing the 98th percentile of return energy height), studies comparing GEDI data with airborne LiDAR have reported RMSE values in the range of 5.15 m to 5.50 m, with R2 values around 0.67 to 0.73.33 The accuracy of GEDI-derived canopy height is notably influenced by terrain complexity and slope, with accuracy generally decreasing as slope increases. In complex terrains, GEDI has been shown to outperform ICESat-2 for canopy height estimation.36
○	Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS): ALS can achieve very high accuracy for canopy height. For instance, in Scandinavian boreal forests, RMSE values of 1.45–1.56 m (representing 10–11% of the average height) have been reported for mean tree height.25 Models developed using sparse ALS point clouds have yielded R2 values ranging from 89.5% to 94.8% for stand height.23
●	Above-Ground Biomass (AGB) / Volume:
○	LiDAR (ALS): Generally considered a highly accurate technology for AGB and volume estimation. In Scandinavian boreal forests, RMSE for stem volume has been reported in the range of 11-18% of the true mean.25 Studies using sparse ALS data have achieved R2 values of 84.2–91.7% for wood volume.23 In New Zealand, research on Pinus radiata plantations indicates R2 values up to 0.82 for total stem volume using ALS.27 Functional regression models utilizing LiDAR-derived canopy height distributions (CHD) or canopy height quantile functions (CHQ) show promise for developing scale-invariant biomass estimation methods, which is important for consistent estimation across varying plot or pixel sizes.56
○	GEDI L4A (AGBD product): One study integrating GEDI L4A data with multi-source remote sensing inputs reported an R2 of 0.56 and an RMSE of 9.09 Mg·ha−1.57 The performance of the GEDI L4A product can vary significantly depending on the specific data combinations used in the model and the characteristics of the study area; its global stratification methodology may limit accuracy for specific vegetation types, such as olive orchards, not well represented in its calibration.57
○	SAR (Sentinel-1 C-band) + Optical (Sentinel-2) for AGB: In the Brazilian Amazon, a study fusing Sentinel-1 SAR data (backscatter and texture) with Sentinel-2 optical data achieved an RMSE of 70.996 Mg·ha−1 (23.9% of the mean) for AGB estimation using a Random Tree algorithm. SAR backscatter alone (C-band) showed poor correlation with AGB, primarily due to signal saturation in this high-biomass environment.46 L-band and P-band SAR are generally more suitable for AGB estimation in dense forests due to better penetration, but their data availability has been more limited historically.9
●	Forest Cover, Type, and Tree Species Classification:
○	Forest Cover Mapping: The Global Forest Cover map (GFC2020), produced at a 10m resolution using Sentinel data, reported an overall accuracy of 91%. The commission error for the forest class (areas erroneously mapped as forest) was 18%, while the omission error (forest areas missed by the classification) was 8%. Accuracies were noted to be lower in regions with open dry forests, where confusion with sparse tree cover or shrublands is more likely.74
○	Coniferous Forest Extraction: A study using a U2-Net deep learning model with GEE and Landsat/Sentinel imagery for coniferous forest extraction reported an F1 score of 95.4%, OA of 95.5%, precision of 94.2%, recall of 96.6%, and a Kappa coefficient of 94.0%.42
○	Tree Species Classification (Deep Learning):
■	Using airborne LiDAR and high-resolution aerial images with a VGG16 model to classify 18 tree species, an OA of 73.25% was achieved.66
■	The Presto Transformer model, utilizing Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, ERA5 climate data, and SRTM elevation data for tree species classification in the Dutch NFI, demonstrated that its derived features substantially outperformed traditional hand-crafted features when used within a Random Forest classifier framework. Specific OA and Kappa metrics for the Presto model itself are detailed in the full thesis results, which were not fully available in the provided snippets.65
■	CNN and Transformer models (e.g., ResNet, ConvNeXt, ViT, Swin Transformer) applied to super-resolved UAV images for tree species classification achieved OAs up to 98.70% (ConvNeXt) and 98.59% (Swin Transformer) in a specific study.67
○	Tree Species Classification (ALS & Spectral): Integration of ALS data with multispectral or hyperspectral imagery has yielded overall accuracies up to 95% for tree species classification.22 Single Photon LiDAR (SPL) systems showed slightly lower accuracies in one comparison: 83–90% for hardwood/softwood discrimination, and 46–54% for classifying 12 distinct species.23
●	Forest Disturbance Mapping:
○	Fire Burn Severity/Extent (PlanetScope 3m):
■	Using an SVM classifier for mapping burn extent, an average OA across three fires was approximately 89.5%, with an average sensitivity of around 88.8% and specificity of about 89.4%. The combination of RGB and NIR bands from PlanetScope generally performed well, achieving an OA of around 92%.63
■	For mapping biomass consumption (differentiating white ash from black ash as a proxy for severity), the SVM achieved an average OA of approximately 91.2%, with sensitivity for white ash detection around 74.5% and specificity for black ash around 98.7%. Again, the RGB-NIR combination yielded high accuracies (OA ~94%).63
■	A multi-index approach (NBR, BAI, NDVI) using PlanetScope imagery for the Yushan National Park fire in Taiwan reported that NBR identified the burned area with 97.1% accuracy when compared to official government reports.62
○	General Forest Disturbance and Recovery (Landsat Time Series): A study using Landsat time-series data simultaneously detected forest disturbance and subsequent recovery with an OA of 80.2%. The classification of change levels (severity) achieved an OA of 76.5%.60
●	Forest Health Monitoring (Pests/Diseases with UAVs):
○	General Damage Classification: UAVs equipped with multispectral or hyperspectral sensors are capable of detecting subtle stress indicators. Deep learning models applied to UAV imagery for classifying damage into categories (Healthy, Light Damage, Medium Damage, Heavy Damage, Dead, Fallen) achieved OAs ranging from 74.9% (for separated, more granular categories) to 82.8% (for aggregated categories like Healthy, Damaged, Decay). For the 'Dead' tree category specifically, reported metrics include a precision of 98.0%, recall of 90.6%, and an F1-score of 94.1%.49
○	Specific Pest/Disease Detection: For citrus gummosis detection using UAV hyperspectral imagery, an F-score of 0.85 (OA 0.94) was reported.49 For insect defoliation detection using UAV multispectral imagery and vegetation indices like NDVI and NDVIRE, a 95% detection rate was achieved.49
○	UAV for Stand Density (Individual Tree Detection - ITD): When comparing UAV-derived Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry with UAV-LiDAR for ITD to assess stand density, UAV-SfM showed a recall of 0.85 versus 0.94 for ULS, but a higher precision (0.97 for SfM vs. 0.95 for ULS). The overall F-scores indicated no significant difference between the affordable prosumer-grade photogrammetric UAV and the industrial-grade ULS for this application, highlighting the efficacy of cost-effective UAV solutions.52 Another study reported the highest overall F-score for ITD across various tree height classes using UAS-LiDAR as 0.7344.75
The following tables summarize reported accuracies for key NFI applications using different high-resolution remote sensing technologies.
Table 4.1: Comparative Accuracy of LiDAR Systems for Canopy Height and Biomass/Volume Estimation

Sensor Type	Forest Attribute	Key Accuracy Metrics (R², RMSE, Bias)	Forest Type/Region	Reference Data	Key Snippet(s)	
GEDI L2A	Canopy Height	R2 ~0.67-0.73, RMSE 5.15-5.50 m	Tropical complex terrain	Airborne LiDAR	33	
GEDI L4A	AGB Density	R2 = 0.56, RMSE = 9.09 Mg·ha−1 (with multi-source model)	Olive orchards (Spain)	Field/Modelled	57	
ALS	Mean Tree Height	RMSE 1.45–1.56 m (10–11% of avg. height)	Scandinavian boreal	Field plots	25	
ALS (sparse)	Stand Height	R2 = 89.5–94.8%	Various (country-wide)	Field plots	23	
ALS	Wood Volume	RMSE 11-18% of true mean	Scandinavian boreal	Field plots	25	
ALS (sparse)	Wood Volume	R2 = 84.2–91.7%	Various (country-wide)	Field plots	23	
ALS	Total Stem Volume	R2 = 0.82 (NZ Pinus radiata)	NZ Plantations	Field plots	27	
UAV-LiDAR (ITD)	Stand Density	F-score ~0.73 (overall), Recall 0.94, Precision 0.95 (vs. SfM)	Complex forests	Cleaned ULS ITD	52	
Table 4.2: Accuracy Metrics for Tree Species and Forest Type Classification

RS Data Source	Algorithm/Model	No. Classes/Species	Key Accuracy Metrics (OA, Kappa, F1, etc.)	Study Area/Forest Type	Key Snippet(s)	
Airborne LiDAR & HR Aerial Images	VGG16 (Deep Learning)	18 species	OA 73.25%	Tropical Wetland	66	
Sentinel-1/2, ERA5, SRTM	Presto (Transformer) with RF classifier	7-13 classes	Presto features >> traditional features (Specific metrics in full thesis)	Dutch NFI	65	
Super-resolved UAV Images	ConvNeXt, Swin Transformer (Deep Learning)	Multiple	OA up to 98.70% (ConvNeXt), 98.59% (Swin)	Forest tree species	67	
Landsat/Sentinel & GEE	U2-Net (Deep Learning)	Coniferous vs. Other	F1 95.4%, OA 95.5%, Kappa 94.0%	Coniferous forests	42	
ALS & Multispectral/Hyperspectral	Various	Multiple	OA up to 95%	Urban/Various	22	
SPLidar	Various	2 (Hard/Soft), 12	OA 83-90% (Hard/Soft), 46-54% (12 species)	Various	23	
Sentinel (GFC2020)	Proprietary	Forest/Non-Forest	OA 91%	Global	74	
Table 4.3: Accuracy of High-Resolution Data for Forest Disturbance Mapping

Disturbance Type	RS Data Source	Algorithm/Method	Key Accuracy Metrics (OA, F1, Precision, Recall, etc.)	Study Area	Key Snippet(s)	
Fire Extent	PlanetScope (3m)	SVM	Avg. OA ~89.5%, Sensitivity ~88.8%, Specificity ~89.4% (RGB-NIR OA ~92%)	US Wildfires	63	
Fire Severity	PlanetScope (3m)	SVM (White vs. Black Ash)	Avg. OA ~91.2%, Sensitivity (White Ash) ~74.5%, Specificity (Black Ash) ~98.7%	US Wildfires	63	
Fire Burned Area	PlanetScope	NBR, BAI, NDVI	NBR: 97.1% accuracy vs. official reports	Taiwan	62	
Disturbance/Recovery	Landsat Time Series	LandTrendr-like	OA 80.2% (Detection), OA 76.5% (Severity Levels)	Victoria, AU	60	
Pest/Disease (Gen)	UAV (Multi/Hyperspec)	Deep Learning	OA 74.9-82.8% (Damage Classes). Dead Trees: Precision 98%, Recall 90.6%, F1 94.1%	Various	49	
Insect Defoliation	UAV (Multispectral)	NDVI, NDVIRE	95% defoliation detection	Spain	49	
Factors Influencing Accuracy
The accuracy of NFI products derived from remote sensing is not uniform and is influenced by a complex interplay of factors:
●	Sensor Characteristics: The inherent capabilities of the sensor, including its spatial, spectral, radiometric, and temporal resolution, play a fundamental role.12 For LiDAR, point density and the ability of laser pulses to penetrate the canopy are critical for accurate structural measurements and biomass estimation; higher pulse densities generally lead to improved ITD and AGB estimates.20 For optical sensors, the specific spectral bands available (e.g., red-edge bands for vegetation stress) can significantly impact classification accuracy; for example, GF-6 imagery provided higher accuracy for forest health assessment than Sentinel-2A due to differences in red-edge band configurations.69 SAR wavelength and polarization affect its penetration depth and sensitivity to different forest components, influencing biomass and structure retrieval.43
●	Algorithm Selection and Parameterization: The choice between parametric and non-parametric models, or between traditional machine learning algorithms (like Random Forest, SVM) and more advanced deep learning architectures (CNNs, Transformers), significantly impacts outcomes.9 Deep learning often outperforms traditional methods but typically requires larger training datasets and more computational resources. The performance of algorithms like Random Forest can also be sensitive to the sampling design of the training data.53
●	Forest Environment: The characteristics of the forest itself heavily influence accuracy. Complex forest structures, high species diversity, dense canopies, and significant understory vegetation can make accurate characterization more challenging.9 Terrain conditions, such as steep slopes and rugged aspects, can affect the geometric accuracy of remote sensing data and the reliability of derived metrics, particularly for LiDAR.36 Phenological variations throughout the year and atmospheric conditions (e.g., cloud cover, haze, shadows for optical data) also play a significant role.18 SAR data, while less affected by atmosphere, can be influenced by moisture conditions and tends to saturate in high-biomass forests.43
●	Ground Truth Data Quality: The accuracy, quantity, and representativeness of field data used for model calibration and product validation are critical determinants of the final product accuracy.9 Precise geographic coordinates of field plots are essential for linking ground measurements to remote sensing data effectively.23
●	Scale Considerations: Mismatches between the spatial resolution of remote sensing data (pixel or footprint size) and the size or scale of NFI plots or management units can lead to errors and uncertainties.9 Aggregation of fine-scale data to coarser scales can introduce errors if not handled appropriately. Research into scale-invariant modeling approaches is ongoing to address these challenges.56
●	Data Integration and Fusion: While the fusion of data from multiple sensors (e.g., LiDAR with optical, SAR with optical) often leads to improved accuracy by leveraging complementary information, it also introduces complexities in data processing, co-registration, and error propagation.9
While impressive accuracies are often reported for specific applications and in localized research studies, a significant "validation gap" frequently exists when these methods are applied to large-scale, operational NFI systems across diverse and heterogeneous forest ecosystems. The accuracies achieved in controlled research settings are often context-dependent and may not be directly transferable to broader operational scenarios without careful adaptation and re-validation.12 Factors such as forest heterogeneity, terrain variability, prevailing atmospheric conditions, and the quality of available ground truth data can significantly impact performance when methods are scaled up. This implies that while the technological potential of high-resolution remote sensing is immense, achieving consistent and reliable accuracy at the national scale necessitates the development and implementation of robust, standardized validation protocols and, potentially, the use of regionalized or adaptive models rather than relying on universal solutions derived from isolated case studies.
Furthermore, the ongoing pursuit of higher accuracy through the development of more complex models, particularly in the realm of deep learning, and the increasing use of multi-sensor data fusion introduce new layers of complexity in understanding error sources and their propagation. Deep learning models, while powerful, can sometimes function as "black boxes," making it challenging to pinpoint the exact reasons for specific errors or to fully understand the model's decision-making process.44 Similarly, fusing data from multiple sensors, though often beneficial for overall accuracy, also means combining the inherent errors and uncertainties from each individual data source. The interactions between these errors can be complex and difficult to model.44 This suggests a critical need for NFI programs to invest not only in advanced modeling techniques but also in sophisticated methods for uncertainty quantification and transparent communication of these uncertainties to end-users, a point strongly emphasized in several analyses.12
Interestingly, an emerging consideration in NFI applications is the concept of "good enough" accuracy. For certain NFI objectives, the substantial benefits offered by remote sensing in terms of increased spatial explicitness, enhanced temporal frequency, or reduced operational costs might outweigh the need for marginal gains in thematic accuracy when compared to traditional, often more labor-intensive, field methods. NFIs fundamentally require spatially explicit data, which traditional plot-based approaches struggle to provide cost-effectively over vast national territories.7 Remote sensing, even if not perfectly accurate for every single attribute, can deliver wall-to-wall map products and facilitate more frequent updates.7 For applications such as broad-scale disturbance detection, identifying priority areas for targeted field surveys, or providing indicative spatial patterns of forest resources, a slightly lower thematic accuracy might be deemed acceptable if it is coupled with timely, spatially comprehensive information at a lower cost.12 This implies a shift towards a more nuanced cost-benefit analysis where the overall "value of information"—considering timeliness, spatial detail, and cost-effectiveness—becomes as important as pure thematic accuracy. Such a perspective could lead to the wider adoption of hybrid NFI approaches, where remote sensing provides the essential spatial framework and frequent updates, while strategically allocated field plots provide detailed calibration, validation, and measurement of attributes that remote sensing cannot directly capture.
5. Barriers to Institutional Adoption and Operational Integration in NFIs
Despite the demonstrated potential and advancing capabilities of high-resolution remote sensing, its full institutional adoption and seamless operational integration into NFI programs are often hindered by a complex array of interconnected barriers. These can be broadly categorized into technical, economic, institutional/organizational, capacity/expertise, and scientific/methodological challenges.
Technical Barriers
Technical barriers relate to the intrinsic characteristics of the data and the infrastructure required to handle them.
●	Data Volume and Processing: High-resolution remote sensing, by its nature, generates massive data volumes. For instance, LiDAR point clouds and extensive archives of VHR satellite imagery require significant storage capacity and substantial processing power, which can overwhelm existing NFI infrastructures.12 The computational demands for processing LiDAR data, in particular, can be exceedingly demanding.55
●	Software and Hardware Limitations: Many NFI agencies may lack access to adequate specialized software for advanced remote sensing data processing and analysis, or the necessary high-performance computing hardware to run these tools efficiently.1
●	Data Integration and Standardization: Integrating diverse data sources—including various remote sensing products, NFI field plot data, and other ancillary geospatial datasets—presents significant technical challenges. This is compounded by a lack of standardized methodologies, data formats, and interoperability protocols across different platforms and agencies.12
●	Operational Readiness of New Methods: Transitioning promising research methods into robust, reliable operational workflows is a complex and often lengthy process. Algorithms developed in specific research contexts may not be easily transferable or scalable to different forest types, environmental conditions, or operational NFI scales.12 For instance, the operational use of UAVs in large-scale NFIs is constrained by practical limitations such as battery life, weather dependency, regulatory restrictions, and ensuring consistent image detail and quality across many missions.47
Economic Barriers
Financial constraints are among the most frequently cited impediments to the adoption of advanced remote sensing technologies in NFIs.
●	Data Acquisition Costs: The cost of acquiring commercial high-resolution satellite imagery, commissioning airborne LiDAR surveys, or conducting extensive UAV campaigns can be prohibitive, especially for achieving wall-to-wall national coverage or implementing frequent monitoring updates.12 The high cost of LiDAR data acquisition, in particular, is a primary impediment to its national-scale operational implementation.54
●	Software Licenses and High-Performance Computing (HPC): Significant costs can be associated with licenses for specialized remote sensing and GIS software, as well as the procurement and maintenance of HPC infrastructure required for processing large datasets.12
●	Personnel and Training Costs: The cost of hiring, training, and retaining skilled personnel with expertise in remote sensing data management, advanced analytics (including AI/ML), and GIS is a substantial economic consideration.1
Institutional and Organizational Barriers
These barriers stem from the structures, policies, and cultures within NFI agencies and related governmental bodies.
●	Resistance to Change: A natural inertia often exists within established NFI agencies, leading to reluctance in adopting new technologies or workflows that deviate significantly from traditional, deeply entrenched methods. This can be due to comfort with existing systems, perceived risks of new approaches, or lack of awareness of benefits.3
●	Policy and Governance Gaps: The absence of clear national policies, strategic plans, or adequate funding mandates that explicitly support and guide the integration of remote sensing into NFIs can hinder progress. Additionally, complex or unclear regulatory frameworks, such as those for UAV operations or data privacy, can create obstacles.2
●	Inter-agency Coordination: Insufficient coordination, communication, and collaboration between NFI agencies, remote sensing research institutions, national mapping agencies, and other relevant government bodies can lead to duplicated efforts, incompatible datasets, and missed opportunities for synergy.12
●	Data Sharing Policies: Restrictive data sharing policies or the lack of robust open data initiatives can significantly hinder access to essential remote sensing data (e.g., government-funded ALS campaigns) or NFI ground plot data needed for model calibration and product validation. This limits research, development, and operational use.2
●	Stakeholder Trust and Engagement: A lack of trust among different stakeholders (e.g., government agencies, industry, research community, local communities) or insufficient engagement with end-users regarding the benefits, limitations, and uncertainties of new remote sensing technologies can impede their acceptance and uptake.12
Capacity and Expertise Barriers
The availability of human resources with the necessary skills is a critical factor.
●	Shortage of Skilled Personnel: A common challenge is the lack of sufficient trained staff within NFI agencies who possess expertise in advanced remote sensing data processing, complex analytical techniques (including AI/ML), GIS, data management, and the integration of these into NFI systems and workflows.1
●	Inadequate Training Programs: There is often insufficient investment in continuous professional development and training programs that would enable NFI staff to keep pace with the rapid technological advancements in remote sensing and data science.12
Scientific and Methodological Barriers
These pertain to the underlying science and methods used in remote sensing for NFIs.
●	Research Gaps: Despite significant progress, research gaps remain, particularly concerning the transferability and robustness of methods across diverse forest ecosystems, varying sensor configurations, and different operational conditions. For example, there is a need for more research on integrating optical satellite data to improve the temporal coverage of ALS-derived information.12
●	Validation Challenges: Rigorous validation of remote sensing-derived NFI products at large, operational scales remains a significant challenge. This is often due to the difficulty and cost of acquiring sufficient high-quality, independent reference data and the lack of universally standardized validation protocols.12
●	Algorithm Limitations: While algorithms are continually improving, they can still exhibit limitations. For instance, the performance of machine learning algorithms can be highly sensitive to the quality and characteristics of the training data. The "black box" nature of some advanced ML/DL models can hinder their interpretability, making it difficult to understand why certain errors occur and potentially reducing trust among users.12
●	Communicating Uncertainty: A critical methodological barrier is the lack of trustworthy, spatially explicit uncertainty estimates accompanying many remote sensing-derived map products. Furthermore, effectively communicating complex error sources and uncertainty measures to diverse NFI data users remains a challenge.12
Table 5.1 provides a structured overview of these multifaceted barriers.
Table 5.1: Multifaceted Barriers to High-Resolution Remote Sensing Adoption in NFIs

Barrier Category	Specific Barrier	Description/Impact on NFI	Illustrative Snippet(s)	
Technical	Data Volume & Processing	Massive datasets require significant storage/computational power.	12	
	Software & Hardware	Lack of adequate tools and infrastructure.	12	
	Data Integration & Standardization	Difficulty combining diverse data; lack of common protocols.	12	
	Operational Readiness	Transitioning research to robust operations is complex; methods not always transferable; UAV operational limits (battery, weather).	12	
Economic	Data Acquisition Costs	High cost of VHR imagery, LiDAR, extensive UAV surveys.	15	
	Software Licenses & HPC	Expenses for specialized software and computing.	12	
	Personnel & Training	Cost of hiring and developing skilled staff.	15	
Institutional/ Organizational	Resistance to Change	Inertia against new methods disrupting traditional NFI practices.	3	
	Policy & Governance Gaps	Lack of clear national strategies, funding mandates, or streamlined regulations.	4	
	Inter-agency Coordination	Insufficient collaboration leading to inefficiencies.	12	
	Data Sharing Policies	Restrictive access to essential RS or NFI ground data.	2	
	Stakeholder Trust & Engagement	Lack of trust in new methods or insufficient user engagement.	15	
Capacity/ Expertise	Shortage of Skilled Personnel	Lack of staff trained in advanced RS, AI/ML, GIS.	1	
	Inadequate Training	Insufficient continuous professional development programs.	47	
Scientific/ Methodological	Research Gaps	Need for more research on method transferability and robustness.	12	
	Validation Challenges	Difficulty in large-scale validation; lack of standard protocols.	12	
	Algorithm Limitations	Sensitivity to training data; "black box" nature of some AI models.	44	
	Communicating Uncertainty	Lack of reliable uncertainty estimates for map products.	12	
The barriers to the adoption of high-resolution remote sensing in NFIs are not isolated issues but are highly interconnected, forming a complex system where addressing one challenge in isolation may prove insufficient. For instance, the frequently cited economic barrier of high data acquisition and processing costs 15 is intrinsically linked to the need for significant investment in specialized personnel and continuous training programs (a capacity barrier).15 This, in turn, can be exacerbated by institutional resistance to allocating resources towards new skills development or unproven technologies.3 Therefore, a purely technical solution, such as the availability of a new, advanced sensor, might fail to gain traction if the economic means to procure and operate it are absent, or if the institutional willingness to invest in the necessary capacity building and workflow adjustments is lacking. This systemic interplay suggests that successful and sustainable integration of remote sensing into NFIs necessitates holistic strategies that concurrently address multiple categories of barriers.
A recurring theme in the slow uptake of these technologies is a discernible misalignment between the "technology push" from the research community and an "adoption pull" deficit from many NFI agencies. This gap often arises because purely academic research objectives may not fully align with the practical, operational needs, constraints, and priorities of NFI programs.12 NFI agencies typically prioritize stability, cost-effectiveness, long-term data consistency for trend analysis, and methods that can be smoothly integrated with existing datasets and stringent reporting requirements.12 Much remote sensing research, however, tends to focus on the development of novel data sources or methodologies rather than demonstrating their direct utility, robustness, and cost-benefit for specific end-users within the NFI operational context.12 This underscores a critical need for more collaborative research models where NFI practitioners and policymakers are involved from the early stages of defining research questions and co-developing solutions. Such partnerships would help ensure that the resulting technologies and methods are not only scientifically sound but also operationally feasible, directly address pressing information needs, and are tailored to the specific constraints faced by NFI agencies.
Finally, the perceived risk associated with adopting new and often complex technologies acts as a significant deterrent for NFI institutions. NFIs are inherently long-term monitoring programs that require methodological consistency over decades to ensure the reliability of trend assessments.3 The field of remote sensing, however, is characterized by rapid evolution, with new sensors and analytical techniques emerging frequently.12 This dynamism can lead to concerns within NFI agencies about the longevity of any particular technological approach and the wisdom of investing heavily in associated training, software, and infrastructure that might quickly become obsolete. The "black box" nature of some advanced algorithms, such as certain deep learning models, can also create a lack of trust if their internal workings are not well understood or if their performance has not been exhaustively validated under diverse operational conditions.44 Coupled with tight financial constraints, these factors make large, upfront investments in technologies that are unproven at the full operational scale of an NFI appear particularly risky.15 To mitigate these perceived risks and encourage adoption, strategies such as phased implementation, extensive pilot projects in operational settings, clear and transparent demonstration of cost-benefit advantages over existing methods, robust and independent validation of new products, and the development of transparent, transferable, and well-documented methods are crucial. These approaches can help to de-risk the adoption process for NFI agencies, fostering greater confidence in the long-term viability and utility of high-resolution remote sensing solutions.
6. Overcoming Barriers: Solutions, Emerging Strategies, and Future Directions
Addressing the multifaceted barriers to the institutional adoption of high-resolution remote sensing in NFIs requires a concerted effort involving policy adjustments, innovative economic models, targeted capacity building, continuous technological advancement, and strengthened linkages between research and operational forestry. Several strategies and future directions are emerging to facilitate this transition.
Policy and Governance
Effective policy and governance frameworks are fundamental to creating an enabling environment for RS integration.
●	Supportive Policy Frameworks: National governments play a crucial role by developing clear strategies and policies that explicitly encourage, mandate, and fund the integration of remote sensing technologies into NFI programs. This includes setting national priorities for forest monitoring and allocating resources accordingly.2
●	Open Data Initiatives: Promoting free and open access to government-collected remote sensing data, such as national airborne LiDAR coverage or archives of satellite imagery, is critical. Similarly, facilitating access to NFI ground plot data (with appropriate privacy and sensitivity safeguards) can significantly foster research, methods development, and the operational use of RS by a wider community of users.2 The US FIA program, for instance, has a long history of leveraging publicly available data and making its own data accessible, which has spurred numerous research applications.1
●	International Collaboration and Harmonization: Active engagement in international collaborations and initiatives, such as REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation), SilvaCarbon, and GEO-FCT (Global Forest Observations Initiative Community of Practice Task), is vital for knowledge sharing, capacity building, and the development of harmonized methods and standards. This ensures that national efforts align with global best practices and reporting requirements.12 The pilot project in Chile using the GCBM model for REDD+ reporting, involving collaboration with Canadian Forest Service and moja global, exemplifies such efforts.88
●	Streamlined Regulatory Processes: Simplifying and clarifying regulatory processes, for example, for UAV flight permissions or for data sharing across agencies, can reduce administrative burdens and expedite the adoption of new technologies.15
Economic Models and Financial Sustainability
Ensuring long-term financial sustainability is key to the operational integration of RS in NFIs.
●	Innovative Funding Mechanisms: Exploring and implementing innovative funding models is essential. These can include public-private partnerships, where private sector entities contribute to data acquisition or analysis in return for access to value-added products or services. Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes, the sale of carbon credits derived from improved forest management and monitoring, the issuance of resilience bonds, and the establishment of dedicated forest restoration or conservation funds are other promising avenues.12 For example, projects are leveraging carbon removal credits from buried biomass to finance forest thinning.91 Repositioning forest monitoring and restoration activities as critical infrastructure investments can also attract different types of capital and ensure long-term commitment.15
●	Cost-Benefit Analysis and Value Proposition: NFI agencies and researchers must clearly articulate and quantify the economic benefits, improved efficiencies, and enhanced decision-making capabilities that result from integrating remote sensing. Demonstrating a strong value proposition is crucial for justifying initial investments and securing ongoing funding.12
●	Shared Data Acquisition Costs: Forming consortia of multiple stakeholders (e.g., government agencies, forest industry, conservation organizations) to share the costs of large-scale data acquisitions, such as national or regional ALS campaigns, can make these advanced datasets more affordable and accessible.12
Capacity Building and Knowledge Transfer
Human capacity is a cornerstone of successful RS integration.
●	Investment in Training and Education: Sustained investment in comprehensive training programs is needed for current NFI staff and for educating new professionals. These programs should cover the spectrum from basic remote sensing principles and GIS operations to advanced data analysis techniques, including AI/ML, and the practical integration of these tools into NFI workflows.1 Initiatives like the FAO's NFI Learning Journey aim to address these needs by providing accessible resources for Member Nations.2 Costa Rica's capacity building efforts with SilvaCarbon for multitemporal visual assessment using Collect Earth Online also highlight this approach.86
●	Communities of Practice and Knowledge Exchange Platforms: Fostering national and international communities of practice, workshops, and online platforms for sharing best practices, innovative tools, operational experiences, and lessons learned among NFI agencies, researchers, and technology providers is essential for accelerating learning and adoption.12
●	Open-Source Tools and Software: Promoting the development, dissemination, and support of open-source software for remote sensing data processing and analysis can significantly reduce software licensing costs and enhance accessibility, particularly for institutions with limited budgets.1
Technological Advancements and Integration
Continuous innovation in RS technology and analytical methods is vital.
●	AI and Machine Learning: The development and operationalization of robust, interpretable, and transferable AI/ML algorithms tailored for NFI applications will continue to be a major driver of progress. The focus is shifting towards the practical use of these techniques in scalable, operational workflows for tasks like species classification, biomass estimation, and change detection.1
●	Cloud Computing Platforms: Leveraging the power of cloud computing platforms such as GEE, AWS, and Azure will be indispensable for efficiently processing, storing, managing, and disseminating the vast amounts of data generated by high-resolution remote sensing and required for national-scale NFIs.1
●	Sensor Fusion and Data Integration: Continued development of advanced methods for fusing data from multiple sensor types (LiDAR, optical, SAR, UAV-based sensors) is crucial for creating more comprehensive, accurate, and robust NFI products. This involves addressing challenges in co-registration, radiometric normalization, and modeling complex data interactions.9
●	Analysis Ready Data (ARD): Promoting the systematic provision and widespread use of ARD products (e.g., atmospherically corrected, geometrically aligned time series) can significantly reduce the pre-processing burden on NFI agencies, allowing them to focus on analysis and information extraction.12
●	User-Friendly Tools and Interfaces: The development of intuitive software, dashboards, and decision-support tools that enable NFI practitioners and other end-users to easily access, analyze, visualize, and utilize remote sensing-derived information is key to bridging the gap between data generation and practical application.
Strengthening Research-Operational Linkages
Closing the gap between research advancements and operational NFI practices is paramount.
●	Collaborative Research and Co-design: Fostering collaborative research projects that involve NFI agencies, academic researchers, and end-users from the outset (co-design) helps ensure that research questions are relevant to operational needs and that the developed solutions are practical and implementable.12
●	Pilot Projects and Operational Trials: Implementing well-designed pilot projects and operational trials is essential for testing and validating new remote sensing methods and technologies within actual NFI settings before committing to full-scale adoption. These trials provide valuable insights into scalability, cost-effectiveness, and practical challenges.12 Canada's phased implementation of Enhanced Forest Inventory (EFI) based on ALS, with pilot projects preceding broader roll-out, is an example.24
●	Standardized Validation Protocols: Establishing and adhering to clear, rigorous, and widely accepted protocols for validating remote sensing-derived NFI products is critical for building trust, ensuring product quality, and enabling comparisons across different methods and regions.12
The experiences of countries that have made significant strides in integrating remote sensing into their NFIs offer valuable lessons. For instance, Nordic countries (Finland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark) are among the early adopters of ALS and satellite imagery. Finland's use of k-NN with satellite data for small area estimation has been operational for decades, producing publicly available forest resource maps and improving accuracy.54 Norway and Sweden have also extensively implemented ALS for their NFIs, often making derived products like terrain models and forest attribute maps publicly accessible.25 Benefits include enhanced accuracy for small area estimation and improved cost-efficiency for certain tasks. However, challenges such as error correlations in data assimilation (as seen in Sweden with time-series data 93) and the initial high costs of data acquisition have been encountered. Key lessons learned from the Nordic experience emphasize the importance of strong multi-disciplinary collaboration between research institutions, government agencies, and forest industry, as well as sustained government support and investment.12 Denmark has utilized countrywide ALS (circa 2014) to support model-assisted and model-calibrated estimates of wood volume and AGB, demonstrating error reductions of 40-45% compared to direct estimates.95
Canada's Enhanced Forest Inventory (EFI) program represents a significant national effort to transition towards ALS-based inventories, although implementation status varies across provinces.24 The EFI typically employs area-based approaches to produce raster and vector products for attributes like tree height, volume, and basal area. The benefits include increased spatial detail, more timely updates, and greater objectivity compared to traditional photo-interpretation methods. However, challenges persist in terms of cost, consistent data sharing policies across jurisdictions, integration with existing traditional inventory workflows, and ongoing research needs, particularly for accurate tree species identification and robust growth and yield modeling from EFI data.7
The United States Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program has a long and rich history of integrating remote sensing, evolving from manual interpretation of aerial photographs to the current use of Landsat and MODIS satellite imagery, airborne and spaceborne LiDAR (including GEDI), and advanced cloud computing platforms like its BIGMAP project.1 Remote sensing is used extensively for stratification to improve sampling efficiency, for mapping forest attributes and land cover change, and for direct estimation. Key benefits include the production of national-scale, spatially explicit products and critical support for carbon accounting and reporting. Challenges have included managing vast data volumes, the costs and complexities of processing, integrating new sensor data streams effectively, and operationalizing advanced small area estimation (SAE) techniques.1
Switzerland's NFI has traditionally relied on aerial photography, including stereo-interpretation, and is now actively exploring the potential of Mobile Laser Scanning (MLS) for detailed plot-level data acquisition.29 While MLS offers benefits like rapid data acquisition even in challenging terrain, studies indicate that the accuracy of MLS-derived variables like DBH and tree detection rates are not yet sufficient to completely replace conventional field measurements within the established Swiss NFI. However, MLS shows promise for deriving new metrics related to forest structural diversity and for providing valuable data for areas not typically covered by intensive field plots.29
In New Zealand, remote sensing, particularly ALS and satellite imagery (e.g., RapidEye), is extensively used for characterizing Pinus radiata plantations and increasingly for small-scale, often fragmented, forest holdings.27 LiDAR has proven superior for deriving key stand variables like height, volume, and basal area. Challenges include the generalization of models developed for specific sites or forest types and the accurate mapping of very young plantation stands.27
Brazil is leveraging the integration of Sentinel-1 (SAR) and Sentinel-2 (optical) data for LULC mapping in complex transitional biomes like the Cerrado-Atlantic Forest interface. Studies demonstrate that fusing SAR and optical data significantly improves classification accuracy compared to using either sensor type alone.45 However, challenges remain, including SAR signal saturation in areas of high biomass and the need for sufficient, high-quality training samples for advanced machine learning and deep learning models.46
Overcoming the diverse barriers to remote sensing adoption in NFIs necessitates a systemic and integrated approach. Simply addressing one type of barrier, such as a technical limitation, in isolation is often insufficient if corresponding economic, institutional, or capacity constraints remain unresolved. Successful integration, as evidenced by leading NFI programs, is typically characterized by strong national leadership that champions innovation, sustained and strategic investment in both technology and human capital, and a deeply ingrained culture of collaboration between research institutions, operational NFI agencies, and end-users of forest information. A national NFI strategy for remote sensing integration should therefore be holistic, encompassing clear policy directives that mandate and support the use of these technologies, sustainable and innovative funding models to cover acquisition and operational costs, robust and continuous capacity-building programs to ensure skilled personnel, and agile mechanisms for the ongoing transfer of validated research findings into operational practice.
The "democratization" of remote sensing—driven by open data policies, powerful cloud computing platforms, and increasingly accessible AI tools—presents both immense opportunities and notable challenges for NFIs. While these trends significantly lower the initial barriers to accessing and processing remote sensing data 1, they also amplify the risk of unvalidated or inappropriately applied methods, particularly if used by individuals or organizations without deep expertise in both remote sensing science and forest inventory principles.12 The proliferation of various remote sensing products can also lead to confusion among users regarding authoritative data sources and the reliability of different products.12 This underscores a critical need: alongside promoting open access and fostering technological innovation, NFI bodies and international organizations like the FAO must vigorously champion the development, dissemination, and adoption of rigorous best practice guidelines, transparent validation standards, and comprehensive capacity-building initiatives. Such measures are essential to ensure the responsible, ethical, and effective use of these powerful new tools for forest monitoring.
Looking ahead, NFIs are likely to evolve into multi-tiered, integrated monitoring systems. In such systems, different remote sensing technologies will be deployed optimally based on their specific strengths and suitability for various scales of assessment—from global and national perspectives down to regional, local, and plot-level details. No single remote sensing technology serves as a panacea; each possesses unique advantages and limitations concerning cost, coverage, resolution, and the specific types of information it can provide. Spaceborne systems like GEDI and the Sentinel constellation offer consistent global or national coverage for broad-scale monitoring and change detection.7 Airborne platforms, carrying sensors like ALS or high-resolution optical cameras, can provide periodic, highly detailed regional assessments for management-level inventories or targeted monitoring campaigns.20 UAVs, with their ability to capture ultra-high resolution data, are ideal for intensive local studies, detailed plot characterization, or rapid response assessments in specific areas of interest.8 Data fusion across these multiple sources is already a key trend and will become even more central [Insight 2.1]. Crucially, traditional field data will remain indispensable. Field plots will continue to serve as the "gold standard" for detailed ground truth, for calibrating and validating remote sensing-derived products, and for capturing essential ecological attributes (e.g., understory composition, soil characteristics, detailed pest/disease symptoms) that remote sensing alone cannot adequately measure.2 The future of NFIs thus points towards a strategic and synergistic combination of these diverse elements: satellite data for continuous wall-to-wall mapping and frequent monitoring; airborne data for periodic, high-detail regional assessments; UAVs for highly localized, intensive studies or as a flexible tool for calibration/validation plot data acquisition; and field plots as the ultimate reference and source for specific ecological parameters. The primary challenge will lie in designing, implementing, and managing these complex, integrated, multi-source NFI systems effectively and sustainably.
7. Conclusion: Charting the Path for Next-Generation National Forest Inventories
The integration of high-resolution remote sensing technologies is fundamentally reshaping the landscape of National Forest Inventories. What were once primarily periodic, field-sample-based assessments are evolving into more dynamic, spatially explicit, and comprehensive forest monitoring systems. This transformation is driven by the urgent need for timely and detailed information to support sustainable forest management, climate change mitigation and adaptation, biodiversity conservation, and international reporting obligations.
Recap of the Transformative Role, Benefits, Accuracies, and Persistent Challenges
High-resolution remote sensing offers a multitude of benefits to NFIs, including significantly improved accuracy for many forest attributes, enhanced spatial detail enabling localized assessments, increased temporal frequency for monitoring dynamic processes, potential cost-efficiencies for certain applications (especially over large or inaccessible areas), and the capability to derive novel forest attributes previously difficult to measure at scale. Accuracy assessments demonstrate substantial progress, with technologies like LiDAR providing precise 3D structural information crucial for biomass and volume estimation, and advanced algorithms (particularly AI/ML) enhancing the classification of forest types, tree species, and the detection of subtle changes related to forest health and disturbances. Reported accuracies vary depending on the specific technology, the attribute being measured, the complexity of the forest environment, and the rigor of validation, but the overall trend is towards increasing reliability and utility.
Despite these advancements, persistent challenges hinder the full operational integration of these technologies. Technical barriers include the need for robust data processing pipelines for massive datasets, ensuring interoperability between diverse data sources, and developing methods that are transferable across varied ecosystems. Economic barriers, particularly the high costs associated with acquiring certain types of high-resolution data (e.g., extensive LiDAR campaigns) and investing in specialized software, hardware, and skilled personnel, remain significant. Institutional and organizational inertia, fragmented governance structures, restrictive data policies, and a lack of sustained political and financial commitment can impede progress. Furthermore, capacity gaps in terms of trained personnel and the scientific-methodological challenges related to large-scale validation, model transferability, and the transparent communication of uncertainties associated with complex models continue to be critical hurdles.
Emphasis on Strategic Actions
Overcoming these barriers and harnessing the full potential of high-resolution remote sensing in NFIs necessitates strategic, concerted, and sustained action across multiple fronts. Holistic national strategies are required that not only promote technological adoption but also address the interconnected policy, economic, institutional, and capacity dimensions. Sustained investment in technology acquisition, infrastructure development, comprehensive capacity building programs, and targeted research is paramount. Fostering a culture of collaboration among government agencies, research institutions, the private sector, and international partners is crucial for sharing knowledge, resources, and best practices. The promotion of open data policies and the development of standardized methodologies and validation protocols will enhance transparency, comparability, and user trust. Critically, efforts must focus on ensuring that the rich information derived from remote sensing is effectively integrated into decision-making processes, thereby translating data into tangible actions for sustainable forest management and climate resilience.
The ultimate success of integrating high-resolution remote sensing into NFIs will be measured not solely by technical advancements or improvements in accuracy metrics, but more fundamentally by the extent to which it leads to more informed, timely, and effective forest management decisions and positive policy outcomes. The overarching goal of NFIs remains the provision of reliable information to support sustainable forest stewardship and evidence-based policy.1 While remote sensing significantly enhances the availability and quality of this information (as detailed in Sections 2, 3, and 4), its potential remains unrealized if this improved data is not effectively translated into actionable intelligence and actively utilized by decision-makers at all levels.12 This implies that future efforts must concentrate not only on continued technological development but also on strengthening the entire information value chain—from data acquisition and analysis to the development of user-friendly decision support systems and the robust assessment of the impact of this information on forest outcomes.
Vision for Future NFIs
The vision for next-generation NFIs is one of adaptive, multi-source, and AI-driven systems. These future NFIs will seamlessly integrate data from a variety of remote sensing platforms (spaceborne, airborne, UAV, ground-based) with traditional field measurements, leveraging the strengths of each to provide a holistic understanding of forest ecosystems. They will be characterized by their ability to provide near real-time information on forest status and change, powered by advanced AI and machine learning algorithms for automated processing, analysis, and interpretation. Cloud computing platforms will serve as the backbone for managing and disseminating the vast quantities of data involved.
As NFIs become increasingly reliant on complex remote sensing technologies and sophisticated AI algorithms, ensuring transparency, reproducibility, and ethical considerations in data processing and model application will become ever more critical. This is essential for maintaining public trust, scientific credibility, and the legitimacy of decisions based on NFI data. The "black box" nature of some advanced algorithms necessitates efforts to improve their interpretability and to clearly communicate their uncertainties.44 Decisions derived from NFI data can have profound economic, social, and environmental consequences, making accountability paramount. Furthermore, concerns regarding data privacy (especially with increasingly detailed individual tree or plot data), potential biases in AI models (e.g., if training data are not representative of all forest conditions or social groups), and the "digital divide" in terms of equitable access to and benefit from these advanced monitoring technologies must be proactively addressed.84 This suggests that NFI programs, alongside embracing technological innovation, must champion and embed principles of responsible AI, open science, and data equity. This includes ensuring that methodologies are well-documented and transparent, that data and models are, where appropriate, accessible for independent scrutiny, and that the benefits derived from advanced forest monitoring are equitably distributed and contribute to inclusive sustainable development. By charting this course, NFIs can effectively meet the evolving national and global demands for comprehensive, reliable, and actionable forest information in the 21st century.
Works cited
1.	(PDF) Use of Remote Sensing Data to Improve the Efficiency of ..., accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347503575_Use_of_Remote_Sensing_Data_to_Improve_the_Efficiency_of_National_Forest_Inventories_A_Case_Study_from_the_United_States_National_Forest_Inventory
2.	Forest data without borders: FAO launches National Forest Inventory Learning Journey to strengthen forest data across Asia and the Pacific, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.fao.org/asiapacific/news/news-detail/forest-data-without-borders--fao-launches-national-forest-inventory-learning-journey-to-strengthen-forest-data-across-asia-and-the-pacific/en
3.	Exploring sustainability challenges in national forest inventories: Tunisia and Mongolia as case studies, accessed May 31, 2025, https://forestsmonitor.com/index.php/fm/article/download/challenges-nfi-tunisia-mongolia/14
4.	Framework for near real-time forest inventory using multi source remote sensing data, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360551290_Framework_for_near_real-time_forest_inventory_using_multi_source_remote_sensing_data
5.	Applications of the United States Forest Inventory and Analysis dataset: A review and future directions, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_journals/2018/rmrs_2018_tinkham_w001.pdf
6.	Remote sensing and forest inventories in Nordic countries – roadmap for the future, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02827581.2017.1416666
7.	Development and implementation of a stand-level satellite-based forest inventory for Canada | Forestry - Oxford Academic, accessed May 31, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/forestry/article/97/4/546/7511999
8.	What is Remote Sensing, and How Is It Used in Forestry? - American Forest Management, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.americanforestmanagement.com/news/what-is-remote-sensing-and-how-is-it-used-in-forestry
9.	Remote sensing support for national forest inventories | Request PDF, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222705104_Remote_sensing_support_for_national_forest_inventories
10.	New technologies and methodologies for national forest inventories, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.fao.org/4/y4001e/Y4001E03.htm
11.	Recent Advancements in High Resolution Remote Sensing for Precision Forestry - MDPI, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing/special_issues/Precision_Forestry
12.	Remote sensing in forestry: current challenges, considerations and ..., accessed May 31, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/forestry/article/97/1/11/7159227
13.	MODIFIED SECOND FOREST REFERENCE EMISSION LEVEL FOR SURINAME'S REDD+ PROGRAMME, accessed May 31, 2025, https://redd.unfccc.int/media/frel2021_modified_resubmitted_20220215_clean.pdf
14.	Cloud computing platforms–based remote sensing big data applications | Request PDF, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390709792_Cloud_computing_platforms-based_remote_sensing_big_data_applications
15.	Overcoming barriers and uncertainties to investing in forested watershed restoration in California - Frontiers, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/forests-and-global-change/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2025.1587763/full
16.	Exploring sustainability challenges in national forest inventories: Tunisia and Mongolia as case studies, accessed May 31, 2025, https://forestsmonitor.com/index.php/fm/article/view/challenges-nfi-tunisia-mongolia
17.	Use of remote sensing technologies to improve forest inventories and management: Review - The Agrology journal, accessed May 31, 2025, https://agrologyjournal.com/index.php/agrology/article/download/168/152
18.	mdpi-res.com, accessed May 31, 2025, https://mdpi-res.com/bookfiles/book/1776/Very_High_Resolution_VHR_Satellite_Imagery_Processing_and_Applications.pdf?v=1746925300
19.	Full article: Forest age estimation using UAV-LiDAR and Sentinel-2 data with machine learning algorithms- a case study of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana), accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10095020.2024.2362752
20.	High-Density UAV-LiDAR in an Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest System, accessed May 31, 2025, https://phoenixlidar.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/High-Density-UAV-LiDAR-in-an-Integrated-Crop-Livestock-Forest-System_-Sampling-Forest-Inventory-or-Forest-Inventory-Based-on-Individual-Tree-Detection-ITD.pdf
21.	californiaagriculture.org, accessed May 31, 2025, https://californiaagriculture.org/article/108877-mapping-forests-with-lidar-provides-flexible-accurate-data-with-many-uses/attachment/213812.pdf
22.	Advancements in Forest Monitoring: Applications and Perspectives of Airborne Laser Scanning and Complementarity with Satellite Optical Data - MDPI, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/567
23.	Remote Sensing Data and Methods in NFI - ResearchGate, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363359534_Remote_Sensing_Data_and_Methods_in_NFI
24.	Enhanced forest inventories in Canada: implementation, status, and research needs, accessed May 31, 2025, https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/abs/10.1139/cjfr-2024-0255?af=R
25.	Airborne laser scanning as a method in operational forest inventory: Status of accuracy assessments accomplished in Scandinavia | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248969899_Airborne_laser_scanning_as_a_method_in_operational_forest_inventory_Status_of_accuracy_assessments_accomplished_in_Scandinavia
26.	Enhanced forest inventory techniques - Natural Resources Canada, accessed May 31, 2025, https://natural-resources.canada.ca/forest-forestry/sustainable-forest-management/enhanced-forest-inventory-techniques
27.	Evaluation of modelling approaches in predicting forest volume and ..., accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326588955_Evaluation_of_modelling_approaches_in_predicting_forest_volume_and_stand_age_for_small-scale_plantation_forests_in_New_Zealand_with_RapidEye_and_LiDAR
28.	How LiDAR Is Becoming an Essential Tool in Forestry | ARTICLE - FARO Technologies, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.faro.com/en/Resource-Library/Article/LiDAR-Essential-in-Forestry
29.	Mauro Marty - Eidg. Forschungsanstalt WSL, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.wsl.ch/en/staff/martym/
30.	Operationalization of Remote Sensing Solutions for Sustainable Forest Management - MDPI, accessed May 31, 2025, https://mdpi-res.com/bookfiles/book/3789/Operationalization_of_Remote_Sensing_Solutions_for_Sustainable_Forest_Management.pdf?v=1747703003
31.	How robust is mobile laser scanning for forest inventory applications – a Swiss case study - Eidg. Forschungsanstalt WSL, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.wsl.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/WSL/Ueber_die_WSL/Veranstaltungen/Remote_Sensing_Lectures/RSLectures_DanielKuekkenbrink2023.pdf
32.	Mobile Laser Scanning for Estimating Tree Structural Attributes in a Temperate Hardwood Forest - MDPI, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/18/4522
33.	data.fs.usda.gov, accessed May 31, 2025, https://data.fs.usda.gov/research/pubs/iitf/ja_iitf_2025_keller_002.pdf
34.	GEDI Lidar | NASA Earthdata, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/instruments/gedi-lidar
35.	GEDI L4C Footprint Level Waveform Structural Complexity Index, Version 2 - ORNL DAAC, accessed May 31, 2025, https://daac.ornl.gov/GEDI/guides/GEDI_L4C_WSCI.html
36.	Accuracy assessment of topography and forest canopy ... - Frontiers, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1547688/full
37.	Accuracy assessment of topography and forest canopy height in complex terrain conditions of Southern China using ICESat-2 and GEDI data - PubMed Central, accessed May 31, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11965696/
38.	Applications of artificial intelligence and LiDAR in forest inventories: A Systematic Literature Review | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386308060_Applications_of_artificial_intelligence_and_LiDAR_in_forest_inventories_A_Systematic_Literature_Review
39.	Comparison of NFI forest decision with forest cover map. Differences... - ResearchGate, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Comparison-of-NFI-forest-decision-with-forest-cover-map-Differences-are-outlined-in-red_fig5_346974497
40.	Using Satellite Imagery to Monitor Deforestation in Supply Chains [Look back - 2025 Update] - Sourcemap, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.sourcemap.com/blog/using-satellite-imagery-to-monitor-deforestation-in-supply-chains-look-back-2025-update
41.	PlanetScope Satellite Imagery - 2025 Eaton Fire - NASA Earthdata, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/dashboard/data-catalog/la-fires-planet
42.	Mapping the Distribution and Dynamics of Coniferous Forests in ..., accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/5/1235
43.	CHAPTER 7 - NASA Earthdata, accessed May 31, 2025, https://earthdata.nasa.gov/s3fs-public/2025-04/SARHB_CH7_Content.pdf
44.	Multi-Source Remote Sensing and GIS- Driven Forest Carbon Monitoring for Carbon Neutrality - Preprints.org, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202505.0246/v1/download
45.	Integrated Use of Synthetic Aperture Radar and Optical Data in ..., accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/14/2559
46.	(PDF) Evaluating SAR-optical sensor fusion for aboveground ..., accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335020457_Evaluating_SAR-optical_sensor_fusion_for_aboveground_biomass_estimation_in_a_Brazilian_tropical_forest
47.	www.jica.go.jp, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.jica.go.jp/english/overseas/png/activities/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2024/08/14/fs_10.pdf
48.	CALL FOR PAPERS IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing Special Issue on “UAV Remote, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.grss-ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/cfp_UAV-Remote-Sensing-Monitoring-and-Applications.pdf
49.	(PDF) The use of UAV-based systems in monitoring forest health ..., accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391262101_The_use_of_UAV-based_systems_in_monitoring_forest_health_Potentials_and_challenges
50.	How NFI Cut Manual Hours at Scale with Gather AI's Autonomous Drones, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.gather.ai/case-studies/nfi
51.	Evaluation of Temporal Trends in Forest Health Status Using Precise Remote Sensing, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/9/5/337
52.	Effective UAV Photogrammetry for Forest Management: New Insights on Side Overlap and Flight Parameters - MDPI, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/15/12/2135
53.	Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (Elsevier BV) | 3735 Publications | 24190 Citations | Top authors - SciSpace, accessed May 31, 2025, https://scispace.com/journals/isprs-journal-of-photogrammetry-and-remote-sensing-1ewpx63t
54.	Remote Sensing of Environment - Forest Service, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.fs.usda.gov/nrs/pubs/jrnl/2016/nrs_2016_barrett_001.pdf
55.	LiDAR Paints Picture of Forests, Fields, and Carbon Storage ..., accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.woodwellclimate.org/lidar-technology-carbon-biomass-estimates/
56.	Lidar remote sensing of forest biomass: A scale-invariant estimation approach using airborne lasers - CDN, accessed May 31, 2025, https://bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/u.osu.edu/dist/7/24705/files/2024/09/lidar-biomass-scale-invariant-forest-carbon.pdf
57.	egusphere.copernicus.org, accessed May 31, 2025, https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-917/egusphere-2025-917.pdf
58.	Remote sensing and artificial intelligence: revolutionizing pest management in agriculture - Frontiers, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1551460/full
59.	A systematic review of the application of remote sensing technologies in mapping forest insect pests and diseases at a tree-level - OUCI, accessed May 31, 2025, https://ouci.dntb.gov.ua/en/works/9Qx15rol/
60.	(PDF) Mapping forest disturbance and recovery for forest dynamics over large areas using Landsat time-series remote sensing - ResearchGate, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320479488_Mapping_forest_disturbance_and_recovery_for_forest_dynamics_over_large_areas_using_Landsat_time-series_remote_sensing
61.	Abstract EGU24-3838 - Meeting Organizer, accessed May 31, 2025, https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU24/EGU24-3838.html
62.	Multi-Index Remote Sensing for Post-Fire Damage Assessment: Accuracy, Carbon Loss, and Conservation Implications - Frontiers, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/forests-and-global-change/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2025.1577612/abstract
63.	Evaluation of Multi-Spectral Band Efficacy for Mapping Wildland Fire ..., accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/21/5196
64.	Toward a Collaborative Framework: Integrating Remote Sensing Research with Forestry Practice - DORA 4RI, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/wsl/islandora/object/wsl%3A40528/datastream/PDF/Waser-2025-Toward_a_collaborative_framework-%28published_version%29.pdf
65.	edepot.wur.nl, accessed May 31, 2025, https://edepot.wur.nl/689338
66.	Deep Learning Approaches for the Mapping of Tree Species Diversity in a Tropical Wetland Using Airborne LiDAR and High-Spatial-Resolution Remote Sensing Images - MDPI, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/10/11/1047
67.	(PDF) Tree Species Classification in UAV Remote Sensing Images Based on Super-Resolution Reconstruction and Deep Learning - ResearchGate, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376489035_Tree_Species_Classification_in_UAV_Remote_Sensing_Images_Based_on_Super-Resolution_Reconstruction_and_Deep_Learning
68.	An enhanced national-scale urban tree canopy cover dataset for the United States Data Release (2025) - USGS.gov, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.usgs.gov/data/enhanced-national-scale-urban-tree-canopy-cover-dataset-united-states-data-release-2025
69.	Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294577401_Random_forest_in_remote_sensing_A_review_of_applications_and_future_directions
70.	Special Issue : Artificial Intelligence and Remote Sensing Applied to Forest Management: Advances in Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications - MDPI, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing/special_issues/X39TJ74G34
71.	Harnessing Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Sustainable Forestry Management and Conservation: Transformative Potential and Future Perspectives - MDPI, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/14/7/998
72.	LiDAR Technology for UAV Detection: From Fundamentals and Operational Principles to Advanced Detection and Classification Techniques - MDPI, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/9/2757
73.	Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.grss-ieee.org/publications/journal-of-selected-topics-in-applied-earth-observations-and-remote-sensing/
74.	Accuracy assessment of the global forest cover map for the year 2020, accessed May 31, 2025, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/e86f56dd-15b5-11f0-b1a3-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
75.	Quantifying the Accuracy of UAS-Lidar Individual Tree Detection Methods Across Height and Diameter at Breast Height Sizes in Complex Temperate Forests - MDPI, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/6/1010
76.	Remote Sensing | Special Issue : Lidar for Forest Parameters Retrieval - MDPI, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing/special_issues/8350IBNDL7
77.	Deep learning convolutional neural networks for Landsat-derived land cover mapping - ResearchGate, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tony-Boston/publication/384330477_Deep_learning_convolutional_neural_networks_for_Landsat-derived_land_cover_mapping/links/66f4bb89906bca2ac3c9bc17/Deep-learning-convolutional-neural-networks-for-Landsat-derived-land-cover-mapping.pdf
78.	ACCC-FASN 2023 abstract book, accessed May 31, 2025, https://downloads.ctfassets.net/hli0qi7fbbos/2yNyTf04k1r625tNALOriS/a37d5a35ab553219dba5726705913417/ACCC_FASN2024_abstract_book.pdf
79.	ISPRS - The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.isprs.org/publications/archives.aspx
80.	International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS), accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.isprs.org/
81.	UAV-Supported Forest Regeneration: Current Trends, Challenges and Implications - MDPI, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/13/2596
82.	(PDF) Enhanced forest inventories in Canada: implementation ..., accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389432976_Enhanced_forest_inventories_in_Canada_implementation_status_and_research_needs
83.	Climate Change Adaptation in Forest and Agricultural Mosaic Landscapes (GEF ID 10186) - FAO Knowledge Repository, accessed May 31, 2025, https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/31e2f0f4-825b-4f37-b31f-ef0f273bdd6b/content
84.	Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2025 - AWS, accessed May 31, 2025, https://hai-production.s3.amazonaws.com/files/hai_ai_index_report_2025.pdf
85.	MTPConnect REDI Initiative Skills Gap Analysis, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mtpconnect.org.au/images/MTPC%20REDI%20Skills%20Gap%20Second%20Report.pdf
86.	ER Monitoring Report (ER-MR) - Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/sites/default/files/documents/costa_rica_2sd_ermr_final_clean_11-jul-2024_final_0.pdf
87.	Combining satellite images with national forest inventory measurements for monitoring post-disturbance forest height growth - Frontiers, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/remote-sensing/articles/10.3389/frsen.2024.1432577/full
88.	Modelling forest carbon dynamics for REDD+ using the Generic Carbon Budget Model (GCBM) Pilot Project Los Rios Region - Chile - Moja Global, accessed May 31, 2025, https://moja.global/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Chile_GCBM_Pilot_Technical_Document.pdf
89.	Earth Observation Handbook 2023, accessed May 31, 2025, https://eohandbook.com/gst/documents/CEOS_EO_Handbook_2023_light.pdf
90.	Trends and innovations in nature finance: what to look out for in 2025, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.unepfi.org/themes/ecosystems/trends-and-innovations-in-nature-finance-what-to-look-out-for-in-2025/
91.	Innovative Finance for National Forests - Spring 2023 Approved Projects | US Forest Service, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.fs.usda.gov/working-with-us/partnerships/conservation-finance/innovative-finance-approved-projects
92.	Remote sensing and forest inventories in Nordic countries ..., accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02827581.2017.1416666
93.	pub.epsilon.slu.se, accessed May 31, 2025, https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/21514/1/lindgren_n_210122.pdf
94.	National forest inventories and remote sensing – better information, better decisions - Nibio, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.nibio.no/en/news/national-forest-inventories-and-remote-sensing--better-information-better-decisions
95.	Lidar supported estimators of wood volume and aboveground biomass from the Danish national forest inventory (2012–2016) | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324690701_Lidar_supported_estimators_of_wood_volume_and_aboveground_biomass_from_the_Danish_national_forest_inventory_2012-2016
96.	Enhanced Forest Inventory, accessed May 31, 2025, https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2022/rncan-nrcan/Fo3-5-3-2021-eng.pdf
97.	Applications of the United States Forest Inventory and Analysis dataset: a review and future directions - Canadian Science Publishing, accessed May 31, 2025, https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/abs/10.1139/cjfr-2018-0196
98.	Swiss National Forest Inventory: Methods and Models of the Second Assessment - Lfi.ch, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.lfi.ch/media/documents/publikationen/anleitungen/LFI2_Methoden.pdf
99.	accessed December 31, 1969, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360549069_Use_of_handheld_mobile_laser_scanning_for_plot-wise_assessment_of_selected_Cylindrocline_variables_in_the_Swiss_National_Forest_Inventory
100.	Mapping Windthrow Risk in Pinus radiata Plantations Using Multi-Temporal LiDAR and Machine Learning: A Case Study of Cyclone Gabrielle, New Zealand - MDPI, accessed May 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/10/1777