Dear City Council Members:

The public's perception, expectation, and mandate for the primary obligation to be provided by their local government can be summed up in one word; p-r-o-t-e-c-t-i-o-n. Protection of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Each of you on the City Council has. or should have, sworn an oath or affirmation to the U.S. Constitution or in the least, to the Kansas Constitution.  Particularily since the Constitution Of The State Of Kansas is the authority from which the City of Wichita derives it's authority for Home Rule.  What does home rule mean if you are asked to permit unconstitutional acts by those who choose to subvert our soverignity by corporate special interests conglomerations for their own greed?  Do you represent Big Wifi or the people of Wichita?

In addition to  insuring the full enjoyment of our rights as American citizens,  Article 1 of the Bill Of Rights states " All men are possessed of equal and inalienable natural rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."  Article 2 states in part " All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and are instituted for their equal protection and benefit..."  And, Article 3 fully states "The people have the right to assemble, in a peaceable manner, to consult for their common good, to instruct their representatives, and to petition the government, or any department thereof, for the redress of grievances"

Now that I have established the basis for this letter, I am curious to learn what has possessed each of you to abandon all sound principles, betray the trust granted you,  and desert the integrity expected for you to hold in your office.  Protection of the public's health, safety, morals and general welfare is not an option.  It is a duty each of you has sworn to uphold.  I find your collective silence relating to the health and safety of your fellow members in the Wichita communiity to be a display of extreme neglegence.  Mounting no available defences or safegards concerning the buildout of 5G wireless communications is troublesome.  Entire countries and many major cities in America have either banned or placed a moreatorium on the rollout of this dangerous technology.  A number of U.S. Senators and State Govenors have spoken out on this "untested" affront to society until the safe implementation can be acheived.  Let there me no misunderstanding; high range frequency of milimeter of microwave and high redio frequency is an asssult on every man, woman, and child.  Whether short periods of high dosages of radiation or cumulative exposure to low dosages of radiation is unacceptable.   If this is news to you then you have failed miserably in your representation of the people.  For every one source touting the benefits of 5G technology you will find at least twenty denouncing its use.  

That which you will allow--through your silence--is to profoundly violate the public trust and irreparably break the social contract.  By voiding the sacred covenant that exists between the goverend and the government, each of you will be totally irrelevant moving forward.   In other words, and as politely as I can say, your credibility with the citizens of Wichita and your ability to maintain your reputatation as able leaders will quickly become a thing of the past.

In Trump's televised press conference announcing his [handlers] stratagy regarding the roll-out of 5G, including rural areas, he mentioned that the cities have an incentive.  What is that that would cause this council to set aside their morals and integtity?

One excellent source which I found to be comprehensive in one website is EMF RESEARCH at https://www.emfresearch.com/  An Independent Information resource of Peer-Reviewed Research into the impacts of electromagnetic fields on humans and our environment.  You won't find any cospiracy related nonsense or unfounded gossip intended to create fear.  I invite you to casually and informally look through the various topics.  Another study performed by the Navel Medical Research Institute can be quite eye-opening. You can find that at: http://www.justproveit.net/sites/default/files/prove-it/files/military_radiowave.pdf?fbclid=IwAR03j_1OCX-o1Nkl5eI3xJoaRwsHeEMep5qnvTGDli87PGqHQDdoX_500SE

and this just this week: "Doctors, Experts Call for Delaying Deployment of 5G Due to Health Risks https://www.ntd.com/doctors-call-for-delaying-deployment-of-5g-due-to-health-risks_339335.html?fbclid=IwAR3QfYOt9mnv8hf6OX-mT4S0Umyd8NADALcWunANCHgGF5iiPzUSwMY1Qa8

To say radiation from electromagnetic frequencies, high radio frequencies or milimeter and microwave technology is untested is totally without merit.  I have personally read dozens of peer reviewed studies about this technology that goes back to the 1970's and find there is an abundance of credible, sound, and sufficient evidence.  This from government, scientists, engineers, physicians, experts and victims as well .  I understand the FCC mandates presumes to have authority over you. It does not. I get it that the powers that be, State and Federal, want to expedite infrastructue quietly and right under the noses of the public. They should not. Where is our notice.  Where is the required disclosure?  How can you believe you have required consent? Property rights are not goverend by the FCC.  The owners of the property govern the FCC including every corporation foreign to any living breathing man or woman.  In particular, the men and women stand above any incorporated entity such as the City of Wichita, the County of Sedgwick, and the State of Kansas.  We are the people. You are the local agents of those artificial creations in your agency as City Council.  You are also our friends and neighbors.

 I'm aware you believe you are under lawful directives to not address health and safety issues in your decisions. You are not correct.  Following orders is not that which inspired men to establish this country. Not following orders did.  I am also aware of the fate of those guilted souls who stood trial in Nuremberg in the years 1945 and 1946.  Their defense of "Just following lawful orders"  did not work out very well  for any of them as they had hoped.  The leaders within the local government of Wichita are marching down a very similar pathway.  I suppose you have that right...of ways.

Updating the Wireless Communication Manual might seem to be plausible deniability.  Given the rise in prevelence of cellular telephones, the updating may seem to be only a benign and mundane task.  That however does not correspond with the hurried objectives and limited review ignoring long-established proceedures and protocols.  Do none of you see that as a something to be questioned further?  Will you not refuse to participate in a war against your own neighbors and your own environment?

 Need I remind any of you that the term "the City of Wichita" does not mean all of the territory within the geographical boundaries encompasing the area known as Wichita. The City of Wichita is that which is within the "corporate city limits"  In terms of area and location The corporate city limits "of" Wichita is the "in" the area "on, below or above the present and future streets, alleys, avenues, roads, highways, parkways or boulevards dedicated or acquired as right-of-way. Given those roads, streets, etc. belong to the public, that leaves a narrow margin on both sides of the roads and streets, etc. in between the curb-and-gutter and the adjacent private property lot line.  
12-512a states:. Vacation of streets, avenues, alleys and lanes by cities; reservation of certain rights-of-way and easements. Any city of the first class under K.S.A. 13-443, any city of the second class under K.S.A. 14-423, or any city of the third class under K.S.A. 15-427, or any amendments to said sections, in vacating by ordinance any street, avenue, alley or lane or part thereof may, reserve to the city and public utilities such rights-of-way and easements as in the judgment of the governing body of the city, are necessary or desirable for public service 

12-506. Reversion of vacated street, alley or public reservation. The streets, alleys or other public reservations which may be so vacated shall revert to the owners of the real estate immediately abutting thereon, according to the frontage of such real estate thereon: Provided, That all lands so reverting shall revert to the owners of abutting lands holding the same by title derived directly or indirectly from the owners of said lands from which said street or alley or public reservation was originally platted.

12-406. Maps and plats sufficient to vest title of lands conveyed for public use in city; effect of recordation. Such maps and plats of such cities and towns, and additions, made, acknowledged, certified, filed and recorded with the register, shall be a sufficient conveyance to vest the fee of such parcels of land as are therein expressed, named or intended for public uses in the city, in trust and for the uses therein named, expressed or intended, and for no other use or purpose.

That is an easement located on privately owned property.  That, in case you did not know, is "the city limits!"  Those city limits are priveliges granted and, as you must know, privilages can be revoked by due process thus overriding any contractural agreement you hold with franchises. A property owners land extends to the center of the road. The private property owners, by succcession of interest, own and possess that land in which the city has an interest.  That interst only concerns its usage.   Those possessing the superior right in and to that property have a God given and constitutional right to protect his life, his family's life, his property and his property rights and by any means necessary.  This is the reason the Second Amendment exists.  It remain uninfringed  to provide for a unified milita, to have the ability to hunt, and to protect one's self and family against the tyranical encroachments of a lawless government. Your duties are to protect those rights and to see that conflict does not arise.  Permiting dangerous technological equipment, regardless of what the fully corrupt FCC deems it to be, within easements upon privately owned property is inviting chaos and trouble.  If that is your goal then this entire letter is in vain.  I don't believe either is. 

Under the 1996 Telecommunications Act, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2013-title47/pdf/USCODE-2013-title47-chap5-subchapIII-partI-sec332.pdf  page 332. Mobile services (a) Factors which Commission must consider In taking actions to manage the spectrum to be made available for use by the private mobile services, the Commission shall consider, consistent with section 151 of this title, whether such actions will—
(1) promote the safety of life and property;

If by safety they mean to imply the nonsensicle belief in overpopulation and that the promotion of genocidal activity will indiscrimanately acheive this objective then I disagree. Or if the promotion of safety of life and property is intended to mean quicker response time to such hazards as fires and bodily injury then I would concur.  Providing there is any logic at all in saving the ailing health of a population and eminently failing environment already destined to be destroyed.

Under (b) on that same page states;  "(b) Advisory coordinating committees (1) The Commission, in coordinating the assignment of frequencies to stations in the private mobile services and in the fixed services (as defined by the Commission by rule), shall have authority to utilize assistance furnished by advisory coordinating committees consisting of individuals who are not officers or employees of the Federal Government....(4) Any advisory coordinating committee which furnishes assistance to the Commission under this subsection shall not be subject to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act."  https://www.gsa.gov/cdnstatic/FACA-Statute-2013.pdf

Well there goes every safeguard right out the window.  Have you any idea at all what that implies?  The Commision deems itself to have authority to utilize assistence (by physial force) from whom?  United Nations?  Foreighn troops? 

Under page 322 of the 1996 Federal Telecumminications Act (linked several paragraphs above) 7.  Preservation of local zoning authority (A) General authority; states "Except as provided in this paragraph, nothing in this chapter shall limit or affect the authority of a State or local government or instrumentality thereof over decisions regarding the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities. And (B)(iii) under Limitations states:  Any decision by a State or local government or instrumentality thereof to deny a request to place, construct, or modify personal wireless service facilities shall be in writing and supported by substantial evidence contained in a written record"

The written record they refer to is the base property deed to which the city has an easement upon.  And where that easement is a reservation of area not later dedicated as streets and roads dedicated as the public's way.

(B)(iii) states; "(v) Any person adversely affected by any final action or failure to act by a State or local government or any instrumentality thereof that is inconsistent with this subparagraph may, within 30 days after such action or failure to act, commence an action in any court of competent jurisdiction. The court shall hear and decide such action on an expedited basis. Any person adversely affected by an act or failure to act by a State or local government or any instrumentality thereof that is inconsistent with clause (iv) may petition the Commission for relief."

Of course such person may bring suit against the commission.  The comission does not override the protections of the Constitution.  Likewise, there is nothing to prevent any person of class of person from bringing suit against local government.  When substantial civil liberties are at stake, and where negligence is the nature of the action governmental imunities are non-existent and will not extend to employees within the scope of their duties when those duties are in conflict with their oath or affirmation. 

Under Availability of Property one should note;  " These procedures may establish a presumption that requests for the use of property, rights-of-way, and easements by duly authorized providers should be granted"  Presumptions may be rebutted and must be proven when challanged.  No one should presume a property owner choses a benefit without having the requisit disclosure of potential hazards.  No contract will withstand being void from the exercise of deception, fraud and non-disclosure of pertinent facts and customary cautions.

I realize you have difficult jobs and even more difficult decisions to make in light of these apparrent mandates.  All I can do as a concerned member of this great community is to stand up for what I believe.  I believe you have a duty and obligation to this community you serve to investigate whether there is a potential health epidemic looming in the not so distant future.  To weigh the pros and cons and form your own conclusions independantly and act upon them.  That, and I pray for each of you... that you will let your conscience, your love for this community , and responsibility to the promises you have made to the citizens who have placed their trust in you.  May God guide you in your hearts and minds to the best or your abilities to protect us all and all those we love.  We trust all of you to do the right thing. Please don't let us down.  Our right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness depends on it.

Thank you for taking the time to read this.

Best regards,

Bruce. Robinson
Wichita, Kansas

A City Council meeting regarding dangers of 5G small cell wireless technology https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUa_XbgZgq8   xxxx switch with below

and here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=6945&v=CIOqvQHhlw-

571 272 1000  firsttime inventor and requirement tick 1-641288530