Have you ever heard the expression the flow of time?

I believe there is a truth to this expression and I will demonstrate it in the following few pages. While I'm at it I will also explain:

A- The following explanations according to concepts we grasp from our current understanding of our universe

 1-	How a simple repeated mistake in the measurement process has caused science to be wrong about; the atomic model, electron having a mass, the actual concept of protons, electrons, neutrons, isotopes, neutrinos and sub atomic particles
 2-	An introduction to what time really is
 3-	What atoms are and how they come into existence
 4-	Odd coincidence with my proposed atomic model and the orbital types proposed by conventional science
 5-	The Big Bang,no such thing
 6-	The double slit experiment solved
 7-	What gravity really is
 8-	What a magnetic field really is
 9-	How and why gravity and magnetic fields are 2 sides of the same coin
 10-	What light is and why it has energy but no size or mass
 11-	What black holes are
 12-	Why objects increase in mass as they move closer to the speed of light
 13-	What inertia really is
 14-	What angular momentum really is
 15-	Lever effect
 16-	Why AC current is more efficient than DC current
 17-	What so called dark matter might be and what the "stuff" science suspects the void of space not being a void really is
 18-	What magnets actually are and how they work
 19-	What temperature is and why heat moves "upwards"
 20-	Why light slows down when it passes through matter and why is speeds back up to regular speed when it exits
 21-	Radiation
 22-	Explain superconductors
 23-	Explain speed of light regardless of speed
 24-	Planck's constant
 25-	A new table of the elements proposed (new names)

B- Conversion of currently understood concepts to the a new set of concepts
 26-	“The God Particle”: The true nature of time and the time wave
 27-	Speed of light problem: Why there is no such thing as distance: Time units should be our reference
 28-	Our Holographic universe

C- Biblical references agreeing with this theory
The truth will be known, then the end will come

Very experimental ideas
C- How to modify elements and compounds and potentially create new ones
E- A theory on how an antigravity device might be built
D- A theory on the principles of how time travel or teleportation might be possible
E- 2012

1 - How a simple repeated mistake in the measurement process has caused science to be wrong about; the atomic model, electron having a mass, the actual concept of protons, electrons, neutrons, isotopes, neutrinos and sub atomic particles

An electron has a mass that is approximately 1/1836 that of the proton yet each are supposed to have the same energy. This single statement should be a flag that something is wrong at the source. This contradicts the concept of mass vs energy. Yet science has been satisfied with this inconsistency accepting it as something that just cannot be explained and that it is how it . So science has had to create complicated, bizarre and even ridiculous concepts to deal with the problems it has created.

The Mistake: 
The source of the mistake: Science has failed to understand the importance and to reinforce the essential common sense concept of balance and simplicity at the source. Nature hints at the path of least resistance. Building blocks of our universe need to be simple. If they are complicated or something is inconsistent it means we are doing something wrong.

C- 
1day=1000yrs
not true that gravity is a weak force in the universe, offset by magnetic field
why gravity keeps us on planet if push & pull one after other
UNIVERSE NOT INFINITE, IT IS ONLY AS LARGE AS TIME HAS EXISTED. BUT FOR US IT WILL ALWAYS BE INFINITE LEST WE FIGURE OUT HOW TO TRAVEL FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT (SPEED OF TIME)

HOW CAN IT BE THAT WAVES CAN TRAVEL IN A VACUUM? IF THERE IS NO MATTER TO TRAVEL THROUGH THEN WHAT ARE WAVES TRAVELING ON? TIME, THIS IS WHY RADIO WAVES TRAVEL AT THE SPEED OF "LIGHT"

WINDOW FROST PATTERNS atoms that were spinning on themselves and then stop as the temperature drops create molecular structures that align and stabilize to different directions in their gravitational field

16-
Temperature is the speed at which an atom spins on itself

the freezing point is the temperature at which atoms stop spinning on themselves. They become locked into place and the material hardens. The melting point is the temperature at which atoms' spinning speed is high enough to create a field that is strong enough to seperate them from other atom's gravity field so their atomic structure disintegrates. When temperature is high enough to make an object glow or create a flame it is because the temperature is making atoms spin at a speed high enough that it goes faster than the speed of time, and they collapse into light. And because outer spheres spin faster than inner spheres it is possible that only the outer spheres collapse, leaving intact the other spheres within the atom which were not spinning faster than the speed of time, which creates a different element.

Heat being spinning atoms can also explain why friction creates heat. By rubbing 2 materials together you are making the atoms spin, like turning the wheels of a toy car, the faster the speed of the friction the faster the atoms spin and the greater the heat. The greater the pressure the greater number of atoms spin and the greater the heat. Simple. Heat, moves upwards because the outward pressure caused by the expansion of matter into space (atom resonance) pushes outward on the atoms which transfer the spinning to upper and upper levels of atoms. So you have a wave of "spin" travelling in the direction matter expands, or upwards for us on earth.

Ice is slippery because the soft maleable nature of water is retained on the 1st layers of atoms even if as a whole it is solid, therefore these first atoms can spin easily but as you get deeper in a block of ice the structure becomes more rigid from the random alignment of atoms (nature of water) that have stopped spinning. The random structure creates a solid "weave" of unmoving matter.

light also when distance is traveled instantly. black hole when spheres get so close together they merge by instantly snapping together, distance travelled by external perimeter of agglomeration of multiple spheres constricting into one single sphere is a distance travelled that needs to be accounted for. Mass (time and distance energy) = time x space. If either time or space = 0 then the energy must be converted to something, it is transformed into light (pure energy). If space is eliminated it is converted to pure energy that travels on the wave of time.

if time space pressure wave (gravity) moves faster than time wave it is converted to light

I will demonstrate this and you will see how magnificently simple all of it is, and how ridiculously complicated we have made our universe to be simply because we have failed to understand the single most important thing and fundamental thing: Time.

Time is not straight and continuous as we feel it or think of it. Time itself is a wave, a sine wave who's wavelength is the same as the diameter of a hydrogen atom (explained later). Each cycle (Time Unit as I refer to it), is the fundamental reference of all material existence. Since we must use time in scientific formulas and since it has a measurable and predictible effect it does not make sense that it isn't used in a quantitative manner.

If time itself is a wave then within the concept of "Space-time" it has the mathematically demonstratable potential to contract and expand (or resonate) space itself

1- Atoms

My theory explains a much simpler model of what we call the atom.

If matter is energy and energy is in the form of waves, and if a wave's fundamental is a sine, and if atoms are a fundemental building block of our three dimensional material universe then whatever this elusive fundamental building block actually is, it must be a 3D sine wave, or if you will, a sphere. 

And because they are waves by their nature, their oscillation would be in the form of expansion and contraction because of space contracting and expanding from the wave nature of time itself

By this atomic model the concept of neutrons doesn't make much sense but it had to exist in traditional models to explain the mass that isn't made up of "protons" or "electrons". In actuality what science calls a proton is actually the expansion of the sphere (positive outward movement) and electrons are the contraction of the sphere (negative inward movement). Neutrons can be explained as the need to account for the volume within the sphere (what we call mass) which is not a linear relationship with the diameter.

Imagine waves flowing in all possible directions at once in a 3 dimensional space. There would be, within that space, standing waves of course. But because the waves would be flowing in all directions these standing waves would appear in the basic fundamental shape of a sphere. Hence the basic nature of the most basic component of our universe. And there would also be other oddball shaped 3D patterns as well created by superimposed spherical standing waves of different dimensions. 

Therefore the atoms we observe are actual patterns created by superimposed 3d standing waves. 

If we would recreate models of spheres expanding and contracting in different patterns and intensities there would eventually be structural patterns that would emerge, and this is what we observe as molecular structures of different elements and compounds.

The different oddball shapes = orbital type
Hydrogen is the most simple and potent element because it is a pure sphere with a single expansion (proton), a single contraction (electron) and no need to account for extra volume (no neutron). It is also why it is the most common element in the universe, because it is THE fundamental. Other elements increase in mass because of the additive nature of superimposed standing 3d waves.

Why then do the rest of these waves not appear in our universe? Because in our three dimensional universe matter can only appear when waves form continuous 3D patterns. In other words nothing that is not a continuous 3D object can be directly perceived in our universe. However science is correct when it suspects that there is more in the vacuum than just a void, like so called dark matter. There is, the universe is made up of different almost-continuous 3D patterns of  "almost matter" and standing waves everywhere. I believe that dark matter might just be that. And perhaps these patterns are revealed when we look up in the sky and see glalxies of different shapes, it would not be impossible that galaxies get their shapes by these patterns. Perhaps some computer generated 3D modelling of waves moving in many directions could produce some patterns that look strikingly familiar...

Isotopes do not exist. Their concept was created to explain the difference in mass between different atoms of the same element. I will now explain where this difference comes from. It is undertood that standing waves have "diffraction patterns". In the 3D world these diffraction patterns would also appear in the form of spheres. And within the space-time "grid" these smaller spheres would find themselves superimposed over fundamentals, causing a variety of slightly different diameter spheres of the same element to occur. 

A similar effect happens with Ions. Where negative Ions are from the larger amplitude diffraction pattern spheres where they create a large enough difference to appear as what conventional science measures as a full electron more. And a negative Ion is when the fundamental sphere is superimposed with a null in the diffraction pattern

These spherical diffraction patterns also explain the theory of so-called subatomic particles. With diffrcation patterns causing smaller amplitude "copies" of the fundamental, in the 3d world this would translate in a smaller constriction-expansion, creating smaller spheres than the fundamental, Hence the adoption of the concept of SUB-atomic particles. 

Light is when an "atom" that once held energy in the form of mass is suddenly no longer part of the 3d universe. Its energy therefore can no longer be subject to space so all its energy must go somewhere? Where can it go? it is transfered in the 2D realm as a timeless dimensionless, massless pulse of pure energy riding on a single cycle of the wave of time. It is pure energy that is being carried through space by time itself. This explains the mystery of the photon. A photon then is not a wave, it is energy RIDING on a wave, the wave of time through space.

This brings me to the mystery of the double slit experiment which I will solve (and you might already be able to do so yourself with the information given so far). Since light is not a wave but is RIDING on a wave then the interference patterns we see when shooting a photon cannot be from the photon itself. Same applies to what we think are electrons that we are shooting. What we are shooting has no mass if it follows the flow of time, otherwise it would have momentum and would shoot straight thru the slit to the back wall acting as matter. Then what are we shooting (hydrogen? if so then perhaps to have inertia and go in a straight line it needs to be a molecule larger than one wavelength otherwise it cannot have inertia and is subject to the wave of time and whatever distortion it experiences by flowing around matter)?and is it that's flowing through both slits at the same time creating a pattern? Time of course. The wave of time flowing through the slits is creating the patterns and the photons are REVEALING the patterns. The photon does not pass through both slits at the same time, this makes no sense. Simple. 

The amplitude of the wave of time, in this particular area of the universe, is equivalent to the diameter of a hydrogen atom.
Therefore one of the first and fundamental subjects that needs to emphasized in science is resonance.
God is light, he moves faster than the speed of time
Hopefully this sheds light on the matter

QUANTUM2
...
Fri, November 6, 2009 3:57:40 PM
From:	
Yvan A. <yvantech@yahoo.com>  
...
View Contact
To:	Yvan A. <yvantech@yahoo.com>	
PERHAPS THE SPEED OF LIGHT = SPEED OF TIME (OR A REFERENCE POINT OF TIME)

SINCE WE ARE ALL "TRAVELING" AT THE SPEED OF TIME WE HAVE BASED OUR UNDERSTANDING AND OUR MATHEMATICAL REPRESENTATIONS OF OUR WORLD RELATIVE TO OTHER "THINGS" WHICH ARE ALSO TRAVELING AT THE SPEED OF TIME. MAYBE WE HAVE OMITTED TO APPLY MATHEMATICAL REPRESENTATIONS RELATIVE TO STILLNESS (TIMELESSNESS). AND WE HAVE OMITTED TO INCLUDE TIME ITSELF IN THE EQUASIONS. PERHAPS TIME IS THE BASE CONSTANT OF THE UNIVERSE AND EVERYTHING IS EQUALLY SUBJECT TO TIME IN THE SAME MANNER REGARDLESS OF ITS MOVEMENT. THIS WOULD EXPLAIN WHY THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS INDEPENDENT OF AN OBJECT'S MOVEMENT.

PERHAPS THIS COULD ALSO POINT TO THE OBSERVER EFFECT IN THE QUANTUM DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT. SINCE TIME AND LIGHT MIGHT BE CORELATED, PERHAPS THE WAVE-LIKE PHENOMENON OBSERVED IN THE EXPERIMENT HAS TO DO WITH 2 POINTS OF LIGHT (ONE GENERATED BY THE APPARATUS, AND THE OTHER THE PERCEPTION FROM THE RECEIVER OR OBSERVER. EVEN THOUGH IT IS BEING RECEIVED IT COULD STILL BE CONSIDERED A POINT OF LIGHT, BUT ABSORBED NOT EMITTED) SOMEHOW INTERFERING WITH EACHOTHER AND CREATING A WAVE-LIKE EFFECT.

THIS WOULD MEAN THAT THE PARTICLES ARE INDEED PARTICLES BUT ARE OBSERVED AS WAVES FROM THE EFFECT OF INTERFERENCE OF 2 POINTS OF LIGHT (TIME). IF MASS INCREASES AS IT APPROACHES THE SPEED OF LIGHT ("SPEED" OF TIME) PERHAPS MASS IS A FUNCTION OF TIME. MATHEMATICALLY TIME WOULD BE PART OF THE EQUASION. LIKE A RESISTOR IN A CIRCUIT SINKS ENERGY INTO HEAT, IF TIME "POTENTIAL" IS ABSORBED BY MOVEMENT PERHAPS IT IS "SUNK" INTO MASS. COULD BE ANOTHER FACET OF TIME/SPACE 

PLANCK'S CONSTANT: THE HIGHER THE FREQUENCY OF LIGHT (WAVELENGTH, AMPLITUDE SPEED) THE HIGHER THE ENERGY AT A GIVEN

INTENSITY. PERHAPS BECAUSE FOR A GIVEN PERIOD THE HIGHER THE FREQUENCY THE MORE TOTAL "VERTICAL WAVE TRAVEL" THERE IS (IF FOR A GIVEN PERIOD THE WAVE AMPLITUDE OF EACH CYCLE IS SUMMED THERE WILL BE MORE TOTAL AMPLITUDE IN A HIGHER FREQUENCY THAN IN A LOWER FREQUENCY IN THAT PERIOD). THIS WOULD BE SIMILAR TO SAYING THE MORE TOTAL VERTICAL "DISTANCE" THE WAVE HAS TRAVELED WITHIN A PERIOD OF TIME BECAUSE OF THE LARGER NUMBER OF CYCLES.

SINCE A PHOTON HAS NO MASS, THEN JUST AS MASS FOR MATTER INCREASES WITH SPEED, PERHAPS

WHEN OBJECT TRAVELS @ SPEED OF LIGHT MASS (SPEED OF TIME) MASS = INFINITE OR 1 AS INFINITENESS IS ONLY DEFINIED WITHIN THE

CONFINES OF OUR MATERIAL UNIVERSE

TIME IS THE BASIS OF EVERYTHING IN THE UNIVERSE AND EVERYTHING WITHIN IT IS DIVIDED. SO AS AN OBJECT APPROACHES THE SPEED OF

TIME IT APPROCHES A STATE OF WHOLENESS, THEREFORE ITS MASS APPROACHES INFINITY

GRAVITY IS ALSO A FUNCTION OF TIME. IT IS A "REFLECTION" OF MATTER (MATERIAL ENERGY) JUST AS MAGNETISM IS A REFLECTION OF

ELECTRICAL ENERGY. SO AS AN OBJECT TRAVELING TOWARDS THE SPEED OF TIME INCREASES IN MASS ITS GRAVITATIONAL FIELD DOES NOT

INCREASE BECAUSE THE EFFECT OF TIME THAT WOULD BE "USED" ON THE MAGNETIC FIELD IS CONSUMED BY THE MOVEMENT OF THE OBJECT, CAUSING NO INCREASE IN GRAVITATIONAL FIELD.

SO NO MATTER WHAT OBJECT TRAVELS AT SPEED OF LIGHT ITS MASS WILL REACH INFINITY (OR THE WHOLE OF THE UNIVERSE) REGARDLESS IF THAT OBJECT IS ONLY PART OF THE WHOLE OF THE UNIVERSE. BECAUSE FROM A POINT OF VIEW EXTERNAL OF OUR UNIVERSE INFINITY CAN BE DIVIDED BECAUSE INFINITY IS A WHOLE. THIS ALSO IS IN LINE WITH THE HOLOGRAM ASPECT OF THE UNIVERSE WHERE ONE PARTICLE CONTAINS THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE'S INFORMATION WITHIN ITSELF

and since the whole of the universe contains the whole of time  (infinity, not to be confused with eternity which infinity is simply a tiny part of) then the sequence of time can somehow be scambled and anachronisms are possible. Hence the "psychic"phenomenon and 

AND SINCE PHOTONS ARE LIGHT, AND LIGHT IS THE SPEED OF TIME, WHICH IS THE BASIS OF THE WHOLE OF THE UNIVERSE, WHY THEN WOULD A PHOTON BE LIMITED TO A MICROSCOPIC PREDETERMINED SIZE? WOULD IT NOT BE POSSIBLE THAT THE SINGLE PHOTON BE ACTUALLY LARGE ENOUGH (AT LEAST ON ONE AXIS) TO PASS THROUGH BOTH SLITS AT THE SAME TIME, CREATING THE WAVE PATTERN AS IF IT WERE A MULTITUDE OF WAVES?

AND AS LIGHT (1) IT IS ONLY LIGHT (TIME) THEREFORE IN THE TIME/SPACE CONTINUUM  LIGHT ITSELF IS NOT SUBJECT TO SPACE THEREFORE IT CAN ORIGINATE ANYWHERE IN SPACE AND BE A STARTING OINT ANYWHERE, (HENCE THE COLLUNDRUM)

GRAVITY IS BASED ON THE SAME PRINCIPLE AS INERTIA, AS MATTER TENDS TO WANT TO MAINTAIN ITS STATE OF MATTER  BY ATTRACTING MORE MATTER

Have you ever heard the expression the flow of time?

I believe there is a truth to this expression and I will demonstrate it in the following few pages. While I'm at it I will also explain:

A- The following explanations according to concepts we grasp from our current understanding of our universe

 29-	How a simple repeated mistake in the measurement process has caused science to be wrong about; the atomic model, electron having a mass, the actual concept of protons, electrons, neutrons, isotopes, neutrinos and sub atomic particles
 30-	An introduction to what time really is
 31-	What atoms are and how they come into existence
 32-	Odd coincidence with my proposed atomic model and the orbital types proposed by conventional science
 33-	The Big Bang,no such thing
 34-	The double slit experiment solved
 35-	What gravity really is
 36-	What a magnetic field really is
 37-	How and why gravity and magnetic fields are 2 sides of the same coin
 38-	What light is and why it has energy but no size or mass
 39-	What black holes are
 40-	Why objects increase in mass as they move closer to the speed of light
 41-	What inertia really is
 42-	What angular momentum really is
 43-	Lever effect
 44-	Why AC current is more efficient than DC current
 45-	What so called dark matter might be and what the "stuff" science suspects the void of space not being a void really is
 46-	What magnets actually are and how they work
 47-	What temperature is and why heat moves "upwards"
 48-	Why light slows down when it passes through matter and why is speeds back up to regular speed when it exits
 49-	Radiation
 50-	Explain superconductors
 51-	Explain speed of light regardless of speed
 52-	Planck's constant
 53-	A new table of the elements proposed (new names)

B- Conversion of currently understood concepts to the a new set of concepts
 54-	“The God Particle”: The true nature of time and the time wave
 55-	Speed of light problem: Why there is no such thing as distance: Time units should be our reference
 56-	Our Holographic universe

C- Biblical references agreeing with this theory
The truth will be known, then the end will come

Very experimental ideas
C- How to modify elements and compounds and potentially create new ones
E- A theory on how an antigravity device might be built
D- A theory on the principles of how time travel or teleportation might be possible
E- 2012

Einstein presented his theory of relativity. However there are 4 flaws in his theory:
1- It assumes that our universe has a fixed dimension and that it is the reference to all observers
2- It assumes that what appears to be the speed of light was the speed of light
3- It assumes that there is an absolute reference when it comes to mass
4- Time is linear

The only constant in the universe is time
There is no absolute reference for dimension
There is no absolute reference for distance.
There is no absolute reference for speed
You will say what about light years and the speed of light?
I propose that what we conventionally thought of as the speed of light, is not the speed of light. Is it the “speed” of TIME. Or what I consider the only real reference; Time Interval. This ill seem abstract and impossible, but even the theory of relativity points to 

Theory of rel pretty accurate except as we approach the speed of time where the discrepancy is made evident

E= Mass * (Time Unit reference (or time units per second) - Time units traveled) * Time Unit reference. Actual “speed” and “distance” traveled then becomes relative to observers in conventional understanding.

C- 
1day=1000yrs
not true that gravity is a weak force in the universe, offset by magnetic field
why gravity keeps us on planet if push & pull one after other

16-
. 

if time space pressure wave (gravity) moves faster than time wave it is converted to light

1- Atoms

The amplitude of the wave of time, in this particular area of the universe, is equivalent to the diameter of a hydrogen atom.
Therefore one of the first and fundamental subjects that needs to emphasized in science is resonance.
God is light, he moves faster than the speed of time
Hopefully this sheds light on the matter

-EVERYTHING RELATIVE: TIME-TIME CANCEL EACHOTHER OUT
-CHECK LEVER RATIO & MASS  VS SPEED OF TIME RATIO & MASS
DOES EVERY PHOTON CREATE A TINY BLACK HOLE WHEN MATTER COLLAPSES?

COLOURS:
Atoms spinning in different patterns and different speeds “strobe” the emission of photons according to these patterns and speeds. Therefore different elements and compounds will have different intensities at different wavelengths.

This is why color spectrum changes with temperature. And also explains additive and subtractive synthesis or filtering. In a filter a stream of photons that has already been filtered or  “strobed” by atoms can only be “strobed” by other atoms of compatible speed (or strobe rate, ie wavelength) otherwise the number of photons being reflected drops off significantly.

When water turns into frost or snow the color is white because atoms are not spinning therefore they reflect most frequencies shone upon them, They do not ”strobe” the flow of photons, they just reflrect whatever they receive integrally.

A black body is when atoms spin at a (lower) speed therefore not reflecting visible light. It is a great heat radiator as there is plenty of “headroom” for atoms to accelerate their spin.
. 
Even a black body (ie black colored wood stove) can reflect colors when the atoms get hot enough and spin at a speed which make them reflect certain wavelengths (ie red). And when they get hot enough and the temperature approaches a melting point when atoms speed so fast and their structural pattern becomes so scattered that they reflect photons at various wavelengths (white). Golw red but only reflect white. Explain. 

ATOMS SPEED = HEAT = INCREASE IN MASS (COPPER)
POINTS OF REFERENCE

Since we are all individual points, individual references separated by time to each other, what consists of our matter is actually of a lesser intensity (size) as the separation of time increases. Therefore visual perspective is not merely an optical phenomenon but a material one where matter actually lessens in energy (or intensity if you will) as time-distance increase. But since our existence is holographic it does not mean that it is less important. As a matter of fact we are all as important in the big picture, with no exception, but to ensure our own sustenance, we are all given the perception that we are, to oneself, the most important entity in existence.

Have you ever heard the expression the flow of time?

I believe there is a truth to this expression and I will demonstrate it in the following few pages. While I'm at it I will also explain:

1- What atoms are and how they come into existence
2- How science has been wrong about the electron having a mass and that there is actually no such thing as protons, electrons,  neutrons and isotopes
2- A solution to the mystery of the double slit experiment
3 -What gravity really is
4- What a magnetic field really is
5- How and why gravity and magnetic fields are 2 sides of the same coin
6- What light is and why it has energy but no size or mass
7- What black holes are
8- Why objects increase in mass as they move closer to the speed of light
9- What inertia really is
10- What angular momentum really is
11- Lever effect
why AC current is more efficient than DC current
- what so called dark matter might be and what the "stuff" science suspects the void of space not being a void really is
- what magnets actually are and how they work
What temperature is and why heat moves "upwards"
12- Why light slows down when it passes through matter and why is speeds back up to regular speed when it exits
-explain superconductors
-explain speed of light regardless of speed
planck's constant
1day=1000yrs
not true that gravity is a weak force in the universe, offset by magnetic field
why gravity keeps us on planet if push & pull one after other
UNIVERSE NOT INFINITE, IT IS ONLY AS LARGE AS TIME HAS EXISTED. BUT FOR US IT WILL ALWAYS BE INFINITE LEST WE FIGURE OUT HOW TO TRAVEL FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT (SPEED OF TIME)

HOW CAN IT BE THAT WAVES CAN TRAVEL IN A VACUUM? IF THERE IS NO MATTER TO TRAVEL THROUGH THEN WHAT ARE WAVES TRAVELING ON? TIME, THIS IS WHY RADIO WAVES TRAVEL AT THE SPEED OF "LIGHT"

WINDOW FROST PATTERNS atoms that were spinning on themselves and then stop as the temperature drops create molecular structures that align to different directions when they stop and stabilize in their gravitational field

the freezing point is the temperature at which atoms stop spinning on themselves. They become locked into place and the material hardens. The melting point is the temperature at which atoms' spinning speed is high enough to create a field that is strong enough to seperate them from other atom's gravity field so their atomic structure disintegrates. When temperature is high enough to make an object glow or create a flame it is because the temperature is making atoms spin at a speed high enough that it goes faster than the speed of time, and they collapse into light. And because outer spheres spin faster than inner spheres it is possible that only the outer spheres collapse, leaving intact the other spheres within the atom which were not spinning faster than the speed of time, which creates a different element.

Heat being spinning atoms can also explain why friction creates heat. By rubbing 2 materials together you are making the atoms spin, like turning the wheels of a toy car, the faster the speed of the friction the faster the atoms spin and the greater the heat. The greater the pressure the greater number of atoms spin and the greater the heat. Simple. Heat, moves upwards because the outward pressure caused by the expansion of matter into space (atom resonance) pushes outward on the atoms which transfer the spinning to upper and upper levels of atoms. So you have a wave of "spin" travelling in the direction matter expands, or upwards for us on earth.

Ice is slippery because the soft maleable nature of water is retained on the 1st layers of atoms even if as a whole it is solid, therefore these first atoms can spin easily but as you get deeper in a block of ice the structure becomes more rigid from the random alignment of atoms (nature of water) that have stopped spinning. The random structure creates a solid "weave" of unmoving matter.

light also when distance is traveled instantly. black hole when spheres get so close together they merge by instantly snapping together, distance travelled by external perimeter of agglomeration of multiple spheres constricting into one single sphere is a distance travelled that needs to be accounted for. Mass (time and distance energy) = time x space. If either time or space = 0 then the energy must be converted to something, it is transformed into light (pure energy). If space is eliminated it is converted to pure energy that travels on the wave of time.

if time space pressure wave (gravity) moves faster than time wave it is converted to light

I will demonstrate this and you will see how magnificiently simple all of it is, and how ridiculously complicated we have made our universe to be simply because we have failed to understand the single most important thing and fundamental thing: Time.

Time is not straight and continuous as we feel it or think of it. Time itself is a wave, a sine wave who's wavelength is the same as the diameter of a hydrogen atom (explained later). Each cycle (Time Unit as I refer to it), is the fundamental reference of all material existence. Since we must use time in scientific formulas and since it has a measurable and predictible effect it does not make sense that it isn't used in a quantitative manner.

If time itself is a wave then within the concept of "Space-time" it has the mathematically demonstratable potential to contract and expand (or resonate) space itself

1- Atoms

My theory explains a much simpler model of what we call the atom.

If matter is energy and energy is in the form of waves, and if a wave's fundamental is a sine, and if atoms are a fundemental building block of our three dimensional material universe then whatever this elusive fundamental building block actually is, it must be a 3D sine wave, or if you will, a sphere. 

And because they are waves by their nature, their oscillation would be in the form of expansion and contraction because of space contracting and expanding from the wave nature of time itself

By this atomic model the concept of neutrons doesn't make much sense but it had to exist in traditional models to explain the mass that isn't made up of "protons" or "electrons". In actuality what science calls a proton is actually the expansion of the sphere (positive outward movement) and electrons are the contraction of the sphere (negative inward movement). Neutrons can be explained as the need to account for the volume within the sphere (what we call mass) which is not a linear relationship with the diameter.

Imagine waves flowing in all possible directions at once in a 3 dimensional space. There would be, within that space, standing waves of course. But because the waves would be flowing in all directions these standing waves would appear in the basic fundamental shape of a sphere. Hence the basic nature of the most basic component of our universe. And there would also be other oddball shaped 3D patterns as well created by superimposed spherical standing waves of different dimensions. 

Therefore the atoms we observe are actual patterns created by superimposed 3d standing waves. 

If we would recreate models of spheres expanding and contracting in different patterns and intensities there would eventually be structural patterns that would emerge, and this is what we observe as molecular structures of different elements and compounds.

The different oddball shapes = orbital type
Hydrogen is the most simple and potent element because it is a pure sphere with a single expansion (proton), a single contraction (electron) and no need to account for extra volume (no neutron). It is also why it is the most common element in the universe, because it is THE fundamental. Other elements increase in mass because of the additive nature of superimposed standing 3d waves.

Why then do the rest of these waves not appear in our universe? Because in our three dimensional universe matter can only appear when waves form continuous 3D patterns. In other words nothing that is not a continuous 3D object can be directly perceived in our universe. However science is correct when it suspects that there is more in the vacuum than just a void, like so called dark matter. There is, the universe is made up of different almost-continuous 3D patterns of  "almost matter" and standing waves everywhere. I believe that dark matter might just be that. And perhaps these patterns are revealed when we look up in the sky and see glalxies of different shapes, it would not be impossible that galaxies get their shapes by these patterns. Perhaps some computer generated 3D modelling of waves moving in many directions could produce some patterns that look strikingly familiar...

Isotopes do not exist. Their concept was created to explain the difference in mass between different atoms of the same element. I will now explain where this difference comes from. It is undertood that standing waves have "diffraction patterns". In the 3D world these diffraction patterns would also appear in the form of spheres. And within the space-time "grid" these smaller spheres would find themselves superimposed over fundamentals, causing a variety of slightly different diameter spheres of the same element to occur. 

A similar effect happens with Ions. Where negative Ions are from the larger amplitude diffraction pattern spheres where they create a large enough difference to appear as what conventional science measures as a full electron more. And a negative Ion is when the fundamental sphere is superimposed with a null in the diffraction pattern

These spherical diffraction patterns also explain the theory of so-called subatomic particles. With diffrcation patterns causing smaller amplitude "copies" of the fundamental, in the 3d world this would translate in a smaller constriction-expansion, creating smaller spheres than the fundamental, Hence the adoption of the concept of SUB-atomic particles. 

Light is when an "atom" that once held energy in the form of mass is suddenly no longer part of the 3d universe. Its energy therefore can no longer be subject to space so all its energy must go somewhere? Where can it go? it is transfered in the 2D realm as a timeless dimensionless, massless pulse of pure energy riding on a single cycle of the wave of time. It is pure energy that is being carried through space by time itself. This explains the mystery of the photon. A photon then is not a wave, it is energy RIDING on a wave, the wave of time through space.

This brings me to the mystery of the double slit experiment which I will solve (and you might already be able to do so yourself with the information given so far). Since light is not a wave but is RIDING on a wave then the interference patterns we see when shooting a photon cannot be from the photon itself. Same applies to what we think are electrons that we are shooting. What we are shooting has no mass if it follows the flow of time, otherwise it would have momentum and would shoot straight thru the slit to the back wall acting as matter. Then what are we shooting (hydrogen? if so then perhaps to have inertia and go in a straight line it needs to be a molecule larger than one wavelength otherwise it cannot have inertia and is subject to the wave of time and whatever distortion it experiences by flowing around matter)?and is it that's flowing through both slits at the same time creating a pattern? Time of course. The wave of time flowing through the slits is creating the patterns and the photons are REVEALING the patterns. The photon does not pass through both slits at the same time, this makes no sense. Simple. 

The amplitude of the wave of time, in this particular area of the universe, is equivalent to the diameter of a hydrogen atom.
Therefore one of the first and fundamental subjects that needs to emphasized in science is resonance.
God is light, he moves faster than the speed of time
Hopefully this sheds light on the matter